Which is the most accurate example of conflict between wildlife conservation and pastoral rights?

Correct answer: Grazing being limited when Maasai pastures were turned into parks

The direct answer is A: grazing became limited when Maasai grazing areas were converted into parks. Wildlife conservation tries to protect animals and habitats, while pastoralists need access to land and water for livestock. The conflict appears when a protected area excludes or restricts traditional grazing. Option A is correct because it shows both sides: parks may protect wildlife, but restrictions can harm Maasai livelihood. Option B is wrong because Maasai did not receive ownership of all parks. Option C is wrong because cattle remained livestock, not wildlife, and were not simply released. Option D is wrong because creating a park does not automatically end drought. The key lesson is that conservation policies can create social and economic costs when local rights are ignored. Exam cue: connect park boundaries with restricted grazing.