राजतंत्र समाप्त करने और राजा पर मुकदमा चलाने में क्या अंतर था?

What was the difference between abolishing monarchy and trying the king?

Explanation opens after your attempt
Correct Answer

A. पहला संस्था का अंत था और दूसरा व्यक्ति की जवाबदेही थीThe first was the end of an institution and the second was accountability of a person

Step 1

Concept

Abolishing monarchy was ending an institution. The trial was linked with fixing Louis XVI's responsibility.

Step 2

Why this answer is correct

The correct answer is A. पहला संस्था का अंत था और दूसरा व्यक्ति की जवाबदेही थी / The first was the end of an institution and the second was accountability of a person. Abolishing monarchy was ending an institution. The trial was linked with fixing Louis XVI's responsibility.

Step 3

Exam Tip

राजतंत्र समाप्त करना संस्था का अंत था। मुकदमा लुई सोलहवें की जिम्मेदारी तय करने से जुड़ा था।

Question me issue ya doubt hai?

Answer, explanation, typing mistake ya suggestion directly hamari team ko bhejein. 📱Helpline (Call / WhatsApp): +91 7272824365

Related History Questions

FAQs

History Answer, Explanation and Revision Hints

राजतंत्र समाप्त करने और राजा पर मुकदमा चलाने में क्या अंतर था? / What was the difference between abolishing monarchy and trying the king?

Correct Answer: A. पहला संस्था का अंत था और दूसरा व्यक्ति की जवाबदेही थी / The first was the end of an institution and the second was accountability of a person. Explanation: राजतंत्र समाप्त करना संस्था का अंत था। मुकदमा लुई सोलहवें की जिम्मेदारी तय करने से जुड़ा था। / Abolishing monarchy was ending an institution. The trial was linked with fixing Louis XVI's responsibility.

Which concept should I revise for this History MCQ?

Abolishing monarchy was ending an institution. The trial was linked with fixing Louis XVI's responsibility.

What exam hint can help solve this History question?

राजतंत्र समाप्त करना संस्था का अंत था। मुकदमा लुई सोलहवें की जिम्मेदारी तय करने से जुड़ा था।