Update

Muft Shiksha™ एक 100% Free Education Portal है 🇮🇳, जिसका उद्देश्य Class 9–12 के हर विद्यार्थी तक High-Quality Education को पूरी तरह मुफ्त पहुँचाना है। 🇮🇳 हम मानते हैं कि अच्छी शिक्षा किसी student की आर्थिक स्थिति पर निर्भर नहीं होनी चाहिए। 🇮🇳 हर विद्यार्थी को वही Quality Study Material, MCQs, Quizzes, Exam Preparation, Concept-Based Learning और Bilingual Support मिलना चाहिए, जो आमतौर पर महंगी Coaching या Premium Platforms में मिलता है। Muft Shiksha™ 🇮🇳 इसी सोच के साथ बनाया गया है

Subjects
0 reads0 ratings0 helpful

What conclusion emerges by studying both silence and resistance in Nazi society?

Answer and explanation

Correct answer: Social roles were not identical but varied

The direct answer is A: social roles were not identical but varied. Nazi society was not made up of only supporters or only opponents. Some people actively supported Nazi policies, some stayed silent because of fear, benefit, pressure, or indifference, and some resisted or helped victims. Therefore, the evidence must be read in a balanced way. Option A is correct because silence, cooperation, resistance, and rescue could all exist in the same society. Option B is wrong because everyone was not always resistant; many accepted, supported, or tolerated the regime. Option C is wrong because everyone did not save victims. Option D is wrong because the state strongly influenced people through law, propaganda, policing, fear, and rewards. The key lesson is that ordinary people made different choices, although circumstances affected those choices. Memory cue: do not use extreme words such as “all” and “always” when historical evidence shows varied behaviour.

Related tags

SilenceResistanceBalanced Analysis

Was this question useful?

No ratings yetWrite a review / Rate this question

Student Reviews

No published reviews yet.

Add Muft Shiksha to your Home Screen

In Safari, tap Share, then Add to Home Screen.