Update

Muft Shiksha™ एक 100% Free Education Portal है 🇮🇳, जिसका उद्देश्य Class 9–12 के हर विद्यार्थी तक High-Quality Education को पूरी तरह मुफ्त पहुँचाना है। 🇮🇳 हम मानते हैं कि अच्छी शिक्षा किसी student की आर्थिक स्थिति पर निर्भर नहीं होनी चाहिए। 🇮🇳 हर विद्यार्थी को वही Quality Study Material, MCQs, Quizzes, Exam Preparation, Concept-Based Learning और Bilingual Support मिलना चाहिए, जो आमतौर पर महंगी Coaching या Premium Platforms में मिलता है। Muft Shiksha™ 🇮🇳 इसी सोच के साथ बनाया गया है

Subjects
0 reads0 ratings0 helpful

Maasai people turning to cultivation and trade is evidence of what?

Advertisement

Answer and explanation

Correct answer: Pastoral society was adapting to changing conditions

The Maasai turning partly to cultivation and trade shows that pastoral communities were capable of adapting their livelihood strategies. Pastoralism remained important, but changing conditions could make it harder to depend only on herding. Colonial policies, loss of grazing land, restrictions on movement, drought, disease, market changes, and poverty could all create pressure. Cultivation or trade could provide additional food or income and reduce risk. A change in work therefore does not mean that the earlier livelihood had never mattered.

The correct choice is A because it describes adaptation to changing economic, environmental, and political conditions. The other choices deny well-known links between the Maasai and livestock or ignore the pressures that affected pastoral life. Choosing another activity may have been a practical response to crisis, not proof that pastoralism was unimportant. It is best understood as a flexible livelihood strategy in which people adjusted their work while trying to protect family survival and security.

Related tags

CultivationTradeAdaptation

Frequently asked questions

What is the correct answer to this question?

Pastoral society was adapting to changing conditions

Why is this the correct answer?

The Maasai turning partly to cultivation and trade shows that pastoral communities were capable of adapting their livelihood strategies. Pastoralism remained important, but changing conditions could make it harder to depend only on herding. Colonial policies, loss of grazing land, restrictions on movement, drought, disease, market changes, and poverty could all create pressure. Cultivation or trade could provide additional food or income and reduce risk. A change in work therefore does not mean that the earlier livelihood had never mattered.

The correct choice is A because it describes adaptation to changing economic, environmental, and political conditions. The other choices deny well-known links between the Maasai and livestock or ignore the pressures that affected pastoral life. Choosing another activity may have been a practical response to crisis, not proof that pastoralism was unimportant. It is best understood as a flexible livelihood strategy in which people adjusted their work while trying to protect family survival and security.

Which subject and chapter does this question cover?

This is a Class 9 History question. Chapter: Pastoralists in the Modern World. Topic: Pastoralism in Africa.

Was this question useful?

No ratings yetWrite a review / Rate this question

Student Reviews

No published reviews yet.

Advertisement