Update

Muft Shiksha™ एक 100% Free Education Portal है 🇮🇳, जिसका उद्देश्य Class 9–12 के हर विद्यार्थी तक High-Quality Education को पूरी तरह मुफ्त पहुँचाना है। 🇮🇳 हम मानते हैं कि अच्छी शिक्षा किसी student की आर्थिक स्थिति पर निर्भर नहीं होनी चाहिए। 🇮🇳 हर विद्यार्थी को वही Quality Study Material, MCQs, Quizzes, Exam Preparation, Concept-Based Learning और Bilingual Support मिलना चाहिए, जो आमतौर पर महंगी Coaching या Premium Platforms में मिलता है। Muft Shiksha™ 🇮🇳 इसी सोच के साथ बनाया गया है

Subjects
0 reads0 ratings0 helpful

If republic is called citizen representation how does the trial of Louis XVI strengthen that idea?

Advertisement

Answer and explanation

Correct answer: It shows ruler is accountable to nation not that nation is ruler's property

A republic claims that political power belongs to the nation and is exercised through public institutions, not that the nation is the private property of a ruler. The trial of Louis XVI supported this principle because it treated the king as an accountable person whose actions could be examined by representatives of the nation. His royal birth did not automatically make him the source of law or place him beyond judgment. This made the relationship between ruler and nation fundamentally different from the older monarchical model. Option A states that distinction correctly.

The reasoning is to ask who has the highest political authority. In the republican view, the nation and its laws stand above the individual ruler. A trial could therefore be presented as an act of national accountability, even though the revolutionary process was politically contested. Options B, C and D either make the king supreme, deny the need for representation, or defend feudal privilege. They contradict the principle illustrated by the trial, so option A is the correct choice.

Related tags

RepublicCitizen RepresentationLouis Xvi Trial

Frequently asked questions

What is the correct answer to this question?

It shows ruler is accountable to nation not that nation is ruler's property

Why is this the correct answer?

A republic claims that political power belongs to the nation and is exercised through public institutions, not that the nation is the private property of a ruler. The trial of Louis XVI supported this principle because it treated the king as an accountable person whose actions could be examined by representatives of the nation. His royal birth did not automatically make him the source of law or place him beyond judgment. This made the relationship between ruler and nation fundamentally different from the older monarchical model. Option A states that distinction correctly.

The reasoning is to ask who has the highest political authority. In the republican view, the nation and its laws stand above the individual ruler. A trial could therefore be presented as an act of national accountability, even though the revolutionary process was politically contested. Options B, C and D either make the king supreme, deny the need for representation, or defend feudal privilege. They contradict the principle illustrated by the trial, so option A is the correct choice.

Which subject and chapter does this question cover?

This is a Class 9 History question. Chapter: The French Revolution. Topic: France Abolishes Monarchy and Becomes a Republic.

Was this question useful?

No ratings yetWrite a review / Rate this question

Student Reviews

No published reviews yet.

Advertisement