How was the relation between strong and weak explained in Nazi thought?
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: The strong should rule and the weak should be removed
Nazi thought interpreted society through a brutal, pseudo-biological struggle in which supposedly stronger races and individuals were expected to dominate weaker ones. It rejected the principle of equal human dignity and treated compassion, disability and perceived racial weakness as signs of inferiority. This reasoning helped justify authoritarian rule, persecution and the removal or killing of people labelled undesirable. Option D expresses the Nazi relationship most accurately, although it describes an inhuman ideological claim rather than a legitimate social principle. Options A, B and C are based on protection, equality or cooperation, all of which contradict the Nazi worldview. Therefore option D is correct.
Frequently asked questions
What is the correct answer to this question?
The strong should rule and the weak should be removed
Why is this the correct answer?
Nazi thought interpreted society through a brutal, pseudo-biological struggle in which supposedly stronger races and individuals were expected to dominate weaker ones. It rejected the principle of equal human dignity and treated compassion, disability and perceived racial weakness as signs of inferiority. This reasoning helped justify authoritarian rule, persecution and the removal or killing of people labelled undesirable. Option D expresses the Nazi relationship most accurately, although it describes an inhuman ideological claim rather than a legitimate social principle. Options A, B and C are based on protection, equality or cooperation, all of which contradict the Nazi worldview. Therefore option D is correct.
Which subject and chapter does this question cover?
This is a Class 9 History question. Chapter: Nazism and the Rise of Hitler. Topic: The Nazi Worldview.
Student feedback
Was this question useful?
👍 0 Helpful 👎 0 Not helpful
Yes 0% No 0%
0 responsesStudent Reviews
No published reviews yet.