How was the Führer principle against democracy in Nazi politics?

The leader's command was considered supreme in it

The Führer principle placed the leader above ordinary democratic institutions. In this system, Hitler’s will and command were treated as the highest source of authority. Government officials, institutions, and citizens were expected to obey rather than question or limit the leader. This removed the importance of competition among parties, parliamentary accountability, and the right to oppose government decisions.

Option B is correct because it says that the leader’s command was considered supreme. In a democracy, power is limited by law and institutions, and citizens can criticise rulers. The Führer principle worked in the opposite way: it concentrated authority in one leader and encouraged obedience. Therefore the choices about equal parties, parliamentary supremacy, or free opposition are incorrect.

This is a Class 9 History question. Chapter: Nazism and the Rise of Hitler. Topic: The Nazi Worldview.