How did open expression make disagreements politically legitimate?
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: People could write, speak and present their disagreements in public debate
Open expression allowed citizens to write, speak and place their views before the public. Disagreement could therefore be treated as a legitimate part of political debate rather than as a crime or rebellion. Options B and C suggest enforced uniformity or royal control, which are the opposite of this idea. Exam tip: link freedom of expression with public debate, the press and political participation.
Frequently asked questions
What is the correct answer to this question?
People could write, speak and present their disagreements in public debate
Why is this the correct answer?
Open expression allowed citizens to write, speak and place their views before the public. Disagreement could therefore be treated as a legitimate part of political debate rather than as a crime or rebellion. Options B and C suggest enforced uniformity or royal control, which are the opposite of this idea. Exam tip: link freedom of expression with public debate, the press and political participation.
Which subject and chapter does this question cover?
This is a Class 9 History question. Chapter: The French Revolution. Topic: The Revolution and Everyday Life.
Student feedback
Was this question useful?
👍 0 Helpful 👎 0 Not helpful
Yes 0% No 0%
0 responsesStudent Reviews
No published reviews yet.
