How could a decline in livestock numbers affect generations among Maasai pastoralists?

Correct answer: Poverty and dependence could extend to the next generation

The direct answer is A: poverty and dependence could continue into the next generation. Livestock often represented wealth, food, milk, transport, exchange value and family security. Step by step: a herd declines because of disease, drought, land loss or restrictions; the family has fewer animals and fewer products to sell or consume; children receive less nutrition, education or inheritance; limited assets make recovery difficult; dependence and poverty may therefore continue. A is correct because it explains a long-term, intergenerational effect. B is wrong because wealth does not automatically increase after livestock loss. C is wrong because livestock decline can affect diet, work, status and marriage or inheritance opportunities. D is wrong because every generation still needs water. Memory cue: loss of productive assets can transmit poverty across generations.