Which option gives a wrong conclusion about low density?

Correct answer: Low density always proves abundance of resources

Direct answer: Option C is correct. Low density means that relatively few people live in a given unit of area, such as one square kilometre. It describes the number of people compared with land area; it does not tell us automatically whether resources are plentiful. A place may have low density because of deserts, very cold climate, steep mountains, poor transport, water shortage, or difficult living conditions. Therefore, low density and resource abundance are separate ideas. Option A is correct because fewer people per area is the meaning of low density. Option B is correct because scattered people may live far from schools, hospitals, markets, and roads, making services harder to provide. Option C is wrong because the word “always” makes an unsupported claim: low density does not prove abundant resources. Option D is correct because low density can occur with sparse settlement, where houses and people are widely separated. Memory cue: density tells “how many in an area,” not “how many resources exist.”