Update

Muft Shiksha™ एक 100% Free Education Portal है 🇮🇳, जिसका उद्देश्य Class 9–12 के हर विद्यार्थी तक High-Quality Education को पूरी तरह मुफ्त पहुँचाना है। 🇮🇳 हम मानते हैं कि अच्छी शिक्षा किसी student की आर्थिक स्थिति पर निर्भर नहीं होनी चाहिए। 🇮🇳 हर विद्यार्थी को वही Quality Study Material, MCQs, Quizzes, Exam Preparation, Concept-Based Learning और Bilingual Support मिलना चाहिए, जो आमतौर पर महंगी Coaching या Premium Platforms में मिलता है। Muft Shiksha™ 🇮🇳 इसी सोच के साथ बनाया गया है

Subjects
0 reads0 ratings0 helpful

If camera trap records increase but habitat quality declines in a forest area, which conclusion is correct?

Answer and explanation

Correct answer: More photos alone do not show long-term success

Direct answer: Option A is correct. Camera-trap photographs are only one indicator, not complete proof of conservation success. Step by step: more photographs may result from more animals, better camera placement, greater activity near cameras or repeated images of the same individuals; meanwhile, declining habitat quality shows that food, shelter, water or breeding conditions may be worsening; therefore long-term success cannot be judged from photo numbers alone. Option A is correct. B is wrong because habitat quality is essential to sustained populations. C is wrong because monitoring reveals both progress and danger and should continue. D is wrong because declining habitat indicates that threats may remain. Reliable evaluation combines population trends, habitat condition and other evidence. Memory cue: one positive number cannot cancel an important negative habitat signal.

Related tags

Camera TrapHabitat QualityConservation Assessment

Was this question useful?

No ratings yetWrite a review / Rate this question

Student Reviews

No published reviews yet.

Add Muft Shiksha to your Home Screen

In Safari, tap Share, then Add to Home Screen.