01 Why does the criticism of future education not seem exaggerated in the story?
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: A. Because the machine's benefits are shown but its limits are clear
Explanation: The governing literary method is balanced criticism. The story does not claim that technology is useless: the mechanical teacher provides lessons, asks questions, checks answers, and permits instruction at home. At the same time, its impersonal routine creates boredom and isolation, and its malfunction exposes dependence on machinery. Option A is correct because the narrative acknowledges practical benefits while revealing social and emotional limitations. Option B is false because the machine usually works; only an adjustment is needed. C is unsupported, and D is too absolute because the story idealizes old schooling without proving that every traditional school was perfect. The criticism is persuasive precisely because it is not one-sided.