Why is it proper to call the Indian Constitution a collective achievement of the Constituent Assembly?

Because many members, committees, and debates contributed to it

Correct answer: A. Constitution-making was a collective activity. Members of the Constituent Assembly debated important principles, examined proposals, suggested amendments, and took part in committees dealing with different areas. Drafting required the work of several people and stages: ideas were discussed, provisions were prepared, changes were considered, and the Assembly adopted the final text. Individual leaders had important responsibilities, but no single person alone created the Constitution. B is therefore wrong because it ignores the contributions of the Assembly and its committees. C is wrong because committees were an important part of the process. D is wrong because the Assembly discussed and adopted the constitutional provisions. Calling it a collective achievement recognises cooperation as well as individual contributions. Memory cue: a constitution is built through many voices, committees, revisions, and decisions.

This is a Class 9 Civics question. Chapter: Constitutional Design. Topic: Making of the Indian Constitution (Constituent Assembly).