Why is constitutional remedy necessary for Fundamental Rights?
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: Because without remedy rights may become weak
The governing concept is that a right becomes meaningful only when a person can seek enforcement after a violation. Fundamental Rights are protected by constitutional remedies, which allow an affected person to approach the Supreme Court under Article 32 or an appropriate High Court under Article 226, subject to the relevant legal conditions. A court can issue suitable writs and provide relief when state action unlawfully restricts a protected right. Thus option A is correct: without an enforceable remedy, a right could remain only a promise on paper. Weather, market closure, and sports rules have no logical connection with protecting Fundamental Rights.
Frequently asked questions
What is the correct answer to this question?
Because without remedy rights may become weak
Why is this the correct answer?
The governing concept is that a right becomes meaningful only when a person can seek enforcement after a violation. Fundamental Rights are protected by constitutional remedies, which allow an affected person to approach the Supreme Court under Article 32 or an appropriate High Court under Article 226, subject to the relevant legal conditions. A court can issue suitable writs and provide relief when state action unlawfully restricts a protected right. Thus option A is correct: without an enforceable remedy, a right could remain only a promise on paper. Weather, market closure, and sports rules have no logical connection with protecting Fundamental Rights.
Which subject and chapter does this question cover?
This is a Class 9 Civics question. Chapter: Democratic Rights. Topic: Right to Constitutional RemediesExpanding scope of rights.
Student feedback
Was this question useful?
👍 0 Helpful 👎 0 Not helpful
Yes 0% No 0%
0 responsesStudent Reviews
No published reviews yet.
