Which example shows violation of both equality and dignity?

Correct answer: Making a person sit separately in public meal because of caste

The direct answer is A: separating a person from a public meal because of caste violates both equality and dignity. Equality requires that people not receive unfair treatment because of caste. Dignity means recognising every person as worthy of respect; forced separate seating communicates humiliation and inferior status. Step by step: the reason for separation is caste, the rule treats one person or group differently without a fair democratic basis, and the treatment insults their equal worth. Option A is correct because it shows discrimination and humiliation together. Option B is wrong because placing all students in the same queue is equal treatment. Option C is generally fair when the same identification requirement applies to everyone, so it does not by itself show discrimination or humiliation. Option D is correct and fair because the same rule and penalty apply equally when people break it. Memory cue: caste-based exclusion is a warning sign for both inequality and loss of dignity.