Which criticism of democracy says that consulting many people causes delay?

Correct answer: Democracy can be slow

Direct answer: Option C, democracy can be slow. One criticism of democracy is that decisions may take time because representatives must listen to citizens, debate alternatives, examine consequences, and sometimes build agreement. Step by step: many interests are present; each side presents reasons; discussion and procedures are followed; compromise or a vote may be needed; therefore action can be slower than a single ruler’s order. Option C is correct because it states the criticism of delay. Option A is wrong because “takes quick decisions” is the opposite of this criticism. Option B is wrong because giving rights is generally considered a strength or advantage of democracy, not this criticism. Option D is wrong because increasing citizens’ dignity is also a democratic benefit. The criticism does not prove democracy is useless; careful discussion may improve decisions and prevent arbitrary action. Exam cue: when many people must be consulted, the process may be slower.