Which argument against democracy is linked with change of leaders?

Correct answer: Continuity of policies may reduce

Direct answer: Option B, continuity of policies may reduce. A democratic government can change when voters elect a different party or when leaders change within the system. Step by step: a new leadership may have different priorities; it may review or replace earlier programmes; departments and businesses may need time to adjust; therefore long-term policy continuity can become weaker. Option B is correct because it directly connects changing leaders with possible policy instability. Option A is wrong because greater stability is not the criticism asked for; it describes a possible advantage of a stable government. Option C is wrong because greater citizen dignity is a benefit of democracy, not a problem caused by leadership change. Option D is wrong because no system makes every decision immediately correct, and it does not explain a criticism related to changing leaders. This criticism must be stated carefully: change can reduce continuity, but it also gives voters a chance to correct bad policies. Memory cue: “new leaders may mean new policies.”