What is the most practical benefit of writing fundamental rights in the constitution?

Correct answer: Citizens can seek justice when rights are violated.

Direct answer: A is correct. When fundamental rights are written in the constitution, they become a clear legal standard against which government action can be judged. If an authority violates a protected right, a citizen can approach an appropriate court and ask for a remedy under the law. This makes rights more than promises or moral statements. B is wrong because constitutional protection makes arbitrary removal harder, not easier. C is wrong because courts remain important for interpreting and enforcing rights. D is wrong because elections remain necessary for choosing and holding governments accountable. A correctly states the practical link between written rights, courts and remedies. Memory cue: a written right gives a citizen a legal basis to ask for protection.