In which situation is it necessary to understand the difference between a writ and an ordinary complaint?
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: When there is serious violation of a Fundamental Right
The governing concept is the special constitutional remedy of a writ. A writ is a formal judicial order or direction used by a constitutional court in appropriate circumstances, especially to protect Fundamental Rights or control unlawful public action. A serious rights violation therefore requires understanding whether this remedy is available and how it differs from an ordinary complaint or grievance process, making option A correct. Pleasant weather, a market discount, and a sports victory are unrelated situations. The distinction does not mean every complaint becomes a writ; it means a rights-based constitutional wrong may require a more powerful judicial remedy.
Frequently asked questions
What is the correct answer to this question?
When there is serious violation of a Fundamental Right
Why is this the correct answer?
The governing concept is the special constitutional remedy of a writ. A writ is a formal judicial order or direction used by a constitutional court in appropriate circumstances, especially to protect Fundamental Rights or control unlawful public action. A serious rights violation therefore requires understanding whether this remedy is available and how it differs from an ordinary complaint or grievance process, making option A correct. Pleasant weather, a market discount, and a sports victory are unrelated situations. The distinction does not mean every complaint becomes a writ; it means a rights-based constitutional wrong may require a more powerful judicial remedy.
Which subject and chapter does this question cover?
This is a Class 9 Civics question. Chapter: Democratic Rights. Topic: Right to Constitutional RemediesExpanding scope of rights.
Student feedback
Was this question useful?
👍 0 Helpful 👎 0 Not helpful
Yes 0% No 0%
0 responsesStudent Reviews
No published reviews yet.