In which situation can a restriction on freedom of expression be compatible with human rights?
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: When expression directly incites violence or seriously harms others’ rights
Freedom of expression is a basic democratic right because it permits criticism, debate, and the sharing of unpopular opinions. However, rights operate within a constitutional framework that may allow a necessary and proportionate restriction to prevent direct violence or serious harm to the rights and safety of others. Option A is correct because a genuine incitement to violence can create an immediate public danger. Options B, C, and D are incorrect: criticism of government, an unpopular opinion, or speech from a minority group cannot alone justify a restriction. The test is harm and legality, not convenience or identity.
Frequently asked questions
What is the correct answer to this question?
When expression directly incites violence or seriously harms others’ rights
Why is this the correct answer?
Freedom of expression is a basic democratic right because it permits criticism, debate, and the sharing of unpopular opinions. However, rights operate within a constitutional framework that may allow a necessary and proportionate restriction to prevent direct violence or serious harm to the rights and safety of others. Option A is correct because a genuine incitement to violence can create an immediate public danger. Options B, C, and D are incorrect: criticism of government, an unpopular opinion, or speech from a minority group cannot alone justify a restriction. The test is harm and legality, not convenience or identity.
Which subject and chapter does this question cover?
This is a Class 9 Civics question. Chapter: Democratic Rights. Topic: Human Rights and their protection.
Student feedback
Was this question useful?
👍 0 Helpful 👎 0 Not helpful
Yes 0% No 0%
0 responsesStudent Reviews
No published reviews yet.
