Update

Muft Shiksha™ एक 100% Free Education Portal है 🇮🇳, जिसका उद्देश्य Class 9–12 के हर विद्यार्थी तक High-Quality Education को पूरी तरह मुफ्त पहुँचाना है। 🇮🇳 हम मानते हैं कि अच्छी शिक्षा किसी student की आर्थिक स्थिति पर निर्भर नहीं होनी चाहिए। 🇮🇳 हर विद्यार्थी को वही Quality Study Material, MCQs, Quizzes, Exam Preparation, Concept-Based Learning और Bilingual Support मिलना चाहिए, जो आमतौर पर महंगी Coaching या Premium Platforms में मिलता है। Muft Shiksha™ 🇮🇳 इसी सोच के साथ बनाया गया है

Subjects
0 reads0 ratings0 helpful

If the state always suppresses a peaceful critic in the name of national interest, what is the best analysis?

Advertisement

Answer and explanation

Correct answer: It is a question of difference between reasonable restriction and repression

The correct answer is A. Freedom of speech is important, but it is not unlimited. The Constitution permits certain reasonable restrictions for constitutionally recognised concerns, and a restriction should have a lawful basis, a genuine purpose and a reasonable connection with that purpose. Peaceful criticism by itself is not the same as violence or an immediate threat. If the state uses ‘national interest’ as a permanent excuse to silence every critic, the action may become arbitrary repression rather than a justified restriction. B is wrong because repeated silencing weakens, not strengthens, liberty. C is wrong because suppression is the opposite of free expression. D is wrong because courts remain important for reviewing misuse of power. Remember: lawful, necessary and proportionate restriction is different from blanket suppression.

Related tags

Reasonable RestrictionRepressionFreedom Of SpeechCivil LibertyRight To FreedomDemocratic RightsCivicsClass 9 Mcq

Frequently asked questions

What is the correct answer to this question?

It is a question of difference between reasonable restriction and repression

Why is this the correct answer?

The correct answer is A. Freedom of speech is important, but it is not unlimited. The Constitution permits certain reasonable restrictions for constitutionally recognised concerns, and a restriction should have a lawful basis, a genuine purpose and a reasonable connection with that purpose. Peaceful criticism by itself is not the same as violence or an immediate threat. If the state uses ‘national interest’ as a permanent excuse to silence every critic, the action may become arbitrary repression rather than a justified restriction. B is wrong because repeated silencing weakens, not strengthens, liberty. C is wrong because suppression is the opposite of free expression. D is wrong because courts remain important for reviewing misuse of power. Remember: lawful, necessary and proportionate restriction is different from blanket suppression.

Which subject and chapter does this question cover?

This is a Class 9 Civics question. Chapter: Democratic Rights. Topic: Right to Freedom.

Was this question useful?

No ratings yetWrite a review / Rate this question

Student Reviews

No published reviews yet.

Advertisement

Add Muft Shiksha to your Home Screen

In Safari, tap Share, then Add to Home Screen.