If policies change repeatedly because governments change in a democracy which opposing argument applies?

Correct answer: Argument of policy instability

The direct answer is A: the argument of policy instability. Democracy allows governments to change through elections. Step by step: one government adopts a policy; another government may come to power; it may change or cancel that policy; repeated changes can reduce continuity, create uncertainty, and make long-term planning difficult. This is a criticism or opposing argument, although stability must be balanced with the need to correct bad policies. Option A is correct because it directly describes frequent policy changes caused by changes in government. Option B is wrong because citizen dignity concerns equal respect and participation, not changing policies. Option C is wrong because people’s consent explains a democratic strength, not this criticism. Option D is wrong because peaceful transfer of power is a benefit of democracy; it does not itself mean that policies become unstable. Remember: changing rulers may bring accountability, but frequent policy reversal may reduce continuity.