If eligibility is decided by common rules but votes have different weights, which analysis is correct?

Correct answer: Eligibility may be equal but one value breaks

The direct answer is C: eligibility may be equal, but one value is broken. These are separate parts of democratic equality. Common eligibility rules answer who may vote or contest under the law; equal vote value answers whether each lawful vote has the same weight. The reasoning is: everyone may satisfy the same eligibility rule, so the “one person” part may be respected; each person may receive a vote, so the “one vote” part may appear respected; but if some votes are deliberately weighted more than others, the “one value” part fails. Option A is wrong because equal eligibility does not repair unequal vote weight. Option B is wrong because the problem goes beyond campaigning; it directly changes the power of votes. Option C is correct because it separates eligibility from the equality of voting power. Option D is wrong because unequal vote weights do not remove the need for elections; they show that the election system is not fully democratic. Exam cue: check three questions separately—who can vote, how many votes each gets, and how much each vote counts.