If constituencies are created very unequally, how will the voter load on one representative be affected?

Correct answer: Some representatives may have too many voters and some may have fewer

Direct answer: A, some representatives may have too many voters while others have fewer. Constituency boundaries are expected to create reasonably balanced representation, so that each elected representative serves a broadly comparable population, subject to lawful and practical considerations. If one constituency is made much larger than another, its representative may have to serve many more voters, while another representative may serve far fewer. This can affect accessibility, attention to local problems and the fairness of representation. A is correct because unequal constituency size creates an unequal voter load. B is wrong because boundary imbalance does not automatically remove elected representatives. C is wrong because every constituency still needs an electoral roll identifying eligible voters. D is wrong because secret voting is a separate safeguard and is not ended merely by unequal boundaries. The question does not claim that every constituency must have exactly the same population; it asks about the likely effect of very large inequality. Memory cue: “Unequal areas can mean unequal representation.”