If an officer is appointed to a public office against law, which writ is appropriate?
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: Quo Warranto
The governing concept is the purpose of different writs. Quo Warranto means “by what authority” and is used to question the legal authority under which a person occupies a public office. If an officer has been appointed contrary to the law or lacks the required legal qualification, this writ can require the holder to justify the appointment. Therefore option A is correct. Habeas Corpus concerns unlawful detention of a person. Prohibition generally prevents a lower court or tribunal from continuing proceedings beyond its jurisdiction, while Certiorari is used to review or quash an order of an inferior body in appropriate cases.
Frequently asked questions
What is the correct answer to this question?
Quo Warranto
Why is this the correct answer?
The governing concept is the purpose of different writs. Quo Warranto means “by what authority” and is used to question the legal authority under which a person occupies a public office. If an officer has been appointed contrary to the law or lacks the required legal qualification, this writ can require the holder to justify the appointment. Therefore option A is correct. Habeas Corpus concerns unlawful detention of a person. Prohibition generally prevents a lower court or tribunal from continuing proceedings beyond its jurisdiction, while Certiorari is used to review or quash an order of an inferior body in appropriate cases.
Which subject and chapter does this question cover?
This is a Class 9 Civics question. Chapter: Democratic Rights. Topic: Right to Constitutional RemediesExpanding scope of rights.
Student feedback
Was this question useful?
👍 0 Helpful 👎 0 Not helpful
Yes 0% No 0%
0 responsesStudent Reviews
No published reviews yet.
