Update

Muft Shiksha™ एक 100% Free Education Portal है 🇮🇳, जिसका उद्देश्य Class 9–12 के हर विद्यार्थी तक High-Quality Education को पूरी तरह मुफ्त पहुँचाना है। 🇮🇳 हम मानते हैं कि अच्छी शिक्षा किसी student की आर्थिक स्थिति पर निर्भर नहीं होनी चाहिए। 🇮🇳 हर विद्यार्थी को वही Quality Study Material, MCQs, Quizzes, Exam Preparation, Concept-Based Learning और Bilingual Support मिलना चाहिए, जो आमतौर पर महंगी Coaching या Premium Platforms में मिलता है। Muft Shiksha™ 🇮🇳 इसी सोच के साथ बनाया गया है

Subjects
0 reads0 ratings0 helpful

If a law is applied against Fundamental Rights, on what basis can a citizen approach the court?

Advertisement

Answer and explanation

Correct answer: Right to Constitutional Remedies

The governing constitutional principle is that Fundamental Rights are enforceable, not merely advisory promises. If a law or its application violates a Fundamental Right, the affected person may invoke the Right to Constitutional Remedies and seek judicial protection. The court can examine the alleged violation and, where legally justified, grant an appropriate remedy or issue a constitutional writ. Therefore option B is correct. General tradition, a sports rule and a market policy do not create constitutional jurisdiction or provide a lawful basis for challenging a rights violation. The decisive clue is the direct conflict between state action and a Fundamental Right.

Related tags

Fundamental RightsCourt RemedyConstitutional LawRight To Constitutional Remediesexpanding Scope Of RightsDemocratic RightsCivicsClass 9 Mcq

Frequently asked questions

What is the correct answer to this question?

Right to Constitutional Remedies

Why is this the correct answer?

The governing constitutional principle is that Fundamental Rights are enforceable, not merely advisory promises. If a law or its application violates a Fundamental Right, the affected person may invoke the Right to Constitutional Remedies and seek judicial protection. The court can examine the alleged violation and, where legally justified, grant an appropriate remedy or issue a constitutional writ. Therefore option B is correct. General tradition, a sports rule and a market policy do not create constitutional jurisdiction or provide a lawful basis for challenging a rights violation. The decisive clue is the direct conflict between state action and a Fundamental Right.

Which subject and chapter does this question cover?

This is a Class 9 Civics question. Chapter: Democratic Rights. Topic: Right to Constitutional RemediesExpanding scope of rights.

Was this question useful?

No ratings yetWrite a review / Rate this question

Student Reviews

No published reviews yet.

Advertisement