If a constitution is changed repeatedly without broad consent, what effect may it have on democracy?

Correct answer: Democratic trust and stability may weaken

Direct answer: Option A is correct. A constitution is more than an ordinary government order; it is a basic framework and a durable agreement about how power will be exercised and how rights will be protected. If those rules are changed repeatedly by a narrow group without broad public or political consent, people may doubt whether the framework is fair or dependable. Governments may use changes for short-term advantage, and citizens or opposing groups may lose confidence in institutions. Option B is wrong because frequent changes do not always strengthen rights; they may weaken them. Option C is wrong because rules imposed without consent are not automatically accepted. Option D is wrong because constitutional conflict can increase the need for courts rather than remove it. This does not mean that amendment is never allowed; it means legitimate amendment should follow constitutional procedure and respect democratic consent. Memory cue: change with consent can reform democracy; change without consent can erode trust.