If a constitution is changed repeatedly without agreement, what problem may arise?

Correct answer: Stability and trust may weaken

Direct answer: A is correct. A constitution is expected to provide a durable and trusted framework for public life. It can be amended when genuine needs arise, but repeated changes made without broad agreement may make institutions and citizens unsure about which basic rules will last. People may lose confidence that rights, procedures and limits on government will be respected. Such instability can also make the constitution appear to serve the immediate interests of those in power rather than the common good. A is correct because it identifies the likely effects: weaker stability and weaker trust. B is wrong because frequent changes do not automatically protect rights. C is wrong because unclear or unagreed changes may create confusion rather than clarity. D is wrong because democracy requires accepted rules and accountability, not change by itself. Memory cue: durable rules need both stability and legitimate agreement; amendment is not the same as arbitrary alteration.