If a candidate promises only free gifts in campaign and gives no policy what should voters consider?

Correct answer: They should examine the policies and feasibility of the promises

Direct answer: A is correct. Responsible voters should look beyond an attractive gift promise and ask what the candidate's wider policies are, how the promise could be funded, whether it is practical, and how it would affect the public in the long term. This is informed evaluation rather than automatic acceptance or rejection. B is wrong because choosing only for gifts can distract voters from governance, rights, services, and accountability. C is wrong because avoiding voting removes the citizen's opportunity to make a considered choice. D is wrong because an individual voter cannot personally cancel a candidate's nomination; that belongs to the authorised electoral process. A promise should be judged by feasibility, public interest, and the candidate's overall programme. Memory cue: compare the whole policy plan, not just the attractive offer.