If a candidate makes the campaign only a personal attack, what loss can voters face?

Correct answer: They will receive less useful information about policies and programmes

Correct answer: A. Voters need information about policies, programmes, priorities, and proposed solutions so that they can compare candidates on public issues. A campaign based only on personal attacks shifts attention away from these matters and may leave voters with less useful knowledge for making a choice. A is correct because the main loss is reduced issue-based information and weaker public discussion. B is wrong because personal attacks do not improve the voter list. C is wrong because campaign language does not make vote counting more accurate. D is wrong because nomination is a separate formal process and is not made easier by attacks. Personal criticism may also increase hostility without explaining what the candidate will do. Memory cue: judge public plans, not merely personal insults.