Correct answer: C. Transparent and reasoned governance
Explanation: Direct answer: Option C, transparent and reasoned governance. When the government limits a right, citizens need to know the legal basis and the reasons. Giving reasons makes the decision understandable, reviewable, and accountable; refusing reasons hides possible arbitrariness. Option A, electoral convenience, is not a constitutional quality of governance and cannot justify unexplained restrictions. Option B, tax collection, is unrelated to explaining a rights limitation. Option C correctly combines transparency with reasoned decision-making. Option D, road management, concerns public roads and has no connection with legal justification. A government may sometimes protect sensitive information, but it still needs a lawful and adequate explanation. Memory cue: no reasons means no clear accountability.