Muft Shiksha™ एक 100% Free Education Portal है 🇮🇳, जिसका उद्देश्य Class 9–12 के हर विद्यार्थी तक High-Quality Education को पूरी तरह मुफ्त पहुँचाना है। 🇮🇳 हम मानते हैं कि अच्छी शिक्षा किसी student की आर्थिक स्थिति पर निर्भर नहीं होनी चाहिए। 🇮🇳 हर विद्यार्थी को वही Quality Study Material, MCQs, Quizzes, Exam Preparation, Concept-Based Learning और Bilingual Support मिलना चाहिए, जो आमतौर पर महंगी Coaching या Premium Platforms में मिलता है। Muft Shiksha™ 🇮🇳 इसी सोच के साथ बनाया गया है
In Class 9 Civics, under the chapter Electoral Politics, Why Do We Need Elections? explains why elections are essential in a democracy. Students learn how citizens choose representatives, hold governments accountable, replace leaders peacefully when needed, and give legitimacy to the government. The topic also highlights voting as a means for people to express their choices and expectations.
TOPIC PRACTICE
Quiz this set
Up to 25 questions from this page. Select your focus, then start.
25 questions
Choose questions
Medium · Level 15View options
Choice provides representation, and the possibility of removal creates accountability.
Both choosing and removing representatives are unnecessary.
The power to remove representatives is against democracy.
Representatives should remain permanently in office.
Medium · Level 15View options
Because transparent information is needed along with voting.
Because voting is never necessary.
Because information makes voters weaker.
Because secrecy itself is democracy.
Medium · Level 15View options
Focus on public issues and policies will become weaker.
Policy discussion will automatically become stronger.
Equality will automatically increase.
The mandate will automatically become fairer.
Medium · Level 15View options
Choice helps select a representative, and accountability keeps the representative connected to the people.
Choice and accountability both remove democracy.
Accountability ends immediately after an election.
Having choices reduces the role of the people.
Medium · Level 15View options
Because voters must also be able to decide freely.
Because electoral competition is always wrong.
Because counting votes is unnecessary.
Because the mandate will always remain clear.
Medium · Level 15View options
Periodic review and public control.
The return of monarchy.
Foreign rule.
Silence of voters.
Medium · Level 15View options
जनता प्रतिनिधि चुनती है, जनादेश देती है और अगले चुनाव में समीक्षा करती है
सरकार खुद को चुनती है और जनता चुप रहती है
केवल अदालत सरकार बनाती है
विपक्ष जनादेश लिखता है
Medium · Level 15View options
क्योंकि वे वैधता, जवाबदेही और सत्ता पर जन नियंत्रण भी बनाते हैं
क्योंकि वे नागरिकों को शासन से दूर करते हैं
क्योंकि वे सत्ता को वंशानुगत बनाते हैं
क्योंकि वे मतदाता की राय को महत्वहीन करते हैं
Medium · Level 15View options
जनादेश सरकार को हमेशा के लिए मुक्त कर देता है
जवाबदेही का चुनाव से कोई संबंध नहीं होता
जनादेश केवल उम्मीदवार का निजी दावा है
जनादेश सरकार को अधिकार देता है और अगला चुनाव उसके काम की परीक्षा लेता है
Medium · Level 15View options
क्योंकि यह सभी वयस्क नागरिकों को समान राजनीतिक आवाज देता है
क्योंकि यह केवल धनी नागरिकों को वोट देता है
क्योंकि यह महिलाओं को मतदान से बाहर रखता है
क्योंकि यह वोटों की गिनती को रोकता है
Medium · Level 15View options
क्योंकि सत्ता में बैठे लोगों को गंभीर चुनौती नहीं मिलती
क्योंकि मतदाता अधिक स्वतंत्र हो जाते हैं
क्योंकि विपक्ष अपने आप मजबूत हो जाता है
क्योंकि मतगणना पारदर्शी हो जाती है
Medium · Level 15View options
यह परिणाम पहले से तय करता है
यह वोटों की गिनती छिपाता है
यह मतदाता को डर और दबाव से बचाता है
यह केवल उम्मीदवारों को वोट देता है
Medium · Level 15View options
Ability to compare candidates and policies
Ability to avoid voting
Ability to fix results beforehand
Ability to erase the voter list
Medium · Level 15View options
Toward accountable politics based on issues, work and programmes
Toward politics based on heredity and fear
Toward elections without choices
Toward governance without voting
Medium · Level 15View options
An organised means to monitor and criticise government
A means to end the voter list
A means to weaken the Election Commission
A means to hide the mandate
Medium · Level 15View options
Because it can raise public issues as opposition
Because it cancels the result
Because it removes voters
Because it becomes above governance
Medium · Level 15View options
Because it includes the voter list, nomination, campaigning, voting, and counting of votes.
Because voting is not a part of elections.
Because candidates have no role in elections.
Because the result has no connection with the election process.
Medium · Level 15View options
Because it provides a legal and accepted change instead of conflict.
Because it makes violence compulsory.
Because it gives a leader office for life.
Because it ends the role of voters.
Medium · Level 15View options
Because people will lose a peaceful means to change the government.
Because people will get more democratic choices.
Because the government will automatically become more accountable.
Because political power will become more temporary.
Medium · Level 15View options
It offers real alternatives among different ideologies and programmes.
It bans all political parties.
It gives each voter only one candidate.
It removes the secrecy of voting.
Medium · Level 15View options
Policy-based real choice will become weaker.
Voter freedom will automatically increase.
Counting of votes will become unnecessary.
Democracy will become completely strong.
Medium · Level 15View options
Because citizens influence the direction of public governance through their vote.
Because voting is only private entertainment.
Because voting ends a person’s citizenship.
Because a vote has no connection with the result.
Medium · Level 15View options
Accountability of representatives
Location of polling booth
Voter age
Colour of campaign
Medium · Level 15View options
Function of turning mandate into policy
Function of deciding voter age
Function of printing ballot paper
Function of decorating polling booth
Medium · Level 15View options
Real consent of the people
Hereditary power
Secret rule
Voter passivity
Question 1MediumLevel 15
Why are both choosing and removing representatives necessary in elections?
Correct answer: A
Correct answer: A. Elections have two connected democratic purposes. First, citizens choose people who will represent their interests and take public decisions. Second, citizens must have a lawful opportunity at later elections to reject representatives who perform poorly, ignore public concerns, or fail to keep important promises. This possibility of replacement creates accountability: representatives know that their work can be judged by the people. A is correct because selection gives representation while the chance of replacement prevents office from becoming permanent or uncontrolled. B is wrong because without choosing there is no electoral representation, and without later judgment there is little public control. C is wrong because peaceful replacement is an important democratic practice, not an attack on democracy. D is wrong because permanent office removes the people’s ability to review performance. Memory cue: elections mean choose now and judge later.
If all voters vote but candidates are allowed to hide important information, why will democratic choice be incomplete?
Correct answer: A
Correct answer: A. Voting is meaningful only when citizens have a reasonable opportunity to know the relevant facts about the choices before them. They may need to consider a candidate’s policies, public record, promises, qualifications, and conduct. If important information is hidden, voters can still physically cast ballots, but their decisions may be based on an incomplete or misleading picture. A is correct because democratic choice combines participation with access to relevant, truthful, and understandable information. B is wrong: voting is an important way citizens express their political choice. C is wrong: reliable information generally helps voters judge alternatives; it does not inherently weaken them. D is wrong: secret ballots protect how a person votes, while hiding relevant candidate information prevents informed choice. These are different meanings of secrecy. Memory cue: secret ballot, transparent facts.
If voters are divided only on the basis of caste identity in elections, how will the democratic purpose be affected?
Correct answer: A
Correct answer: A. In a democracy, citizens may have different identities, but elections should also allow them to discuss common public concerns such as education, health, employment, security, and administration. If voters are treated or mobilised only as members of a caste group, attention may shift away from policies and the actual performance of candidates. A is correct because exclusive identity-based division can weaken issue-based evaluation and make citizens judge political choices through a narrow group lens. B is wrong: relying only on caste identity does not strengthen policy discussion. C is wrong: identity-based mobilisation does not automatically produce equality and may deepen divisions. D is wrong: a mandate is not automatically fair merely because many people vote along one identity. Memory cue: identity may matter, but public policy must not disappear.
Why are both public choice and accountability of elected representatives necessary in elections?
Correct answer: A
Correct answer: A. A democratic election is not only a ceremony in which citizens place a vote once. People need meaningful alternatives so that they can compare candidates, policies, and records before choosing a representative. After the election, the representative must remain answerable for decisions and performance. Public criticism, questions, discussion, and the possibility of being rejected in a later election help maintain this connection. A is correct because choice gives citizens a way to select, while accountability gives them continuing political influence and a way to judge results. B is wrong: both features strengthen rather than remove democracy. C is wrong: responsibility does not disappear after the result is declared. D is wrong: genuine alternatives increase the people’s role by making their choice meaningful. Memory cue: choice selects; accountability checks.
If electoral competition exists but voters are influenced by fear and inducement, why will competition not be enough?
Correct answer: A
Correct answer: A. Competition means that more than one candidate or party is available and can seek public support. However, the presence of competitors alone does not guarantee a democratic election. Voters must be able to hear alternatives, consider them, and choose without threats, coercion, bribery, or improper inducement. A is correct because free voter choice is the condition that gives competition democratic meaning. If fear or payment controls the decision, the contest may exist formally while the people’s real preference is suppressed or distorted. B is wrong: fair competition can help voters compare alternatives and is not always wrong. C is wrong: counting is necessary to determine the result of votes that were cast. D is wrong: fear and inducement can make the mandate less reliable and less clear. Memory cue: competition offers choices; freedom makes the choice genuine.
If people change an elected government after five years, which deeper democratic process does this show?
Correct answer: A
Correct answer: A. Regular elections give citizens a scheduled opportunity to assess the government’s work and decide whether it deserves another term. During this review, voters may consider promises, policies, public services, conduct, and the government’s response to people’s concerns. If they choose another government, they are exercising peaceful public control rather than allowing rulers to remain in office permanently. A is correct because periodic review connects elections with accountability and the possibility of a change in power. B is wrong: monarchy normally involves hereditary rule, whereas changing a government through elections expresses popular choice. C is wrong: replacing a government through voting is not foreign rule. D is wrong: changing a government is an active expression of voter judgment, not silence. Memory cue: regular elections let citizens review and renew or replace a government.
How do legitimacy, representation and accountability form together in elections?
Correct answer: A
Correct answer: A. Elections perform three connected democratic functions. First, citizens choose representatives, so the government gets representation from the people rather than claiming power by force or inheritance. Second, the voters' choice gives the elected leaders a mandate, or lawful public approval, to govern. This creates legitimacy. Third, the leaders must explain and defend their work before the people, because voters can reward them by re-electing them or replace them at the next election. That possibility creates accountability. Option A is correct because it includes selection, public approval and later review. Option B is wrong because a government that chooses itself has no genuine popular mandate. Option C is wrong because courts interpret and apply law but do not normally form an elected government. Option D is wrong because the mandate comes from voters, not from the opposition. Memory cue: choose, authorise, review—representation, legitimacy, accountability.
Why are elections considered more than just a process of choosing representatives in democratic governance?
Correct answer: A
Correct answer: A. Choosing a representative is only the first visible part of an election. When citizens vote, they authorise a person or party to exercise public power. This public authorisation gives the government legitimacy. Elections also allow citizens to compare promises with performance, question leaders through public debate, and decide whether to continue or replace them. In this way the people retain a form of control over those who govern between elections. Option A is correct because it includes legitimacy, accountability and public control in addition to representation. B is wrong because elections give citizens a channel to influence government. C is wrong because democratic elections permit replacement rather than hereditary succession. D is wrong because the result is based on voters' political choices. A useful distinction is: representation answers “who speaks for the people?”, legitimacy answers “why may this government rule?”, and accountability answers “how can people judge or remove it?”
How can the relation between mandate and accountability in elections be understood most correctly?
Correct answer: D
Correct answer: D. A mandate is the authority that voters give to a winning candidate or party through their electoral choice. It allows the government to make policies and take decisions for a period, but it is not permanent or unlimited permission. The government must use this authority responsibly and remain answerable to citizens, institutions and law. At the next election, voters can examine its promises, decisions and performance. They may renew its mandate or choose another option. Therefore mandate and accountability are connected: the first gives power, while the second places responsibility on those who receive it. A is wrong because a mandate does not free a government forever. B is wrong because the possibility of electoral judgment is a major source of accountability. C is wrong because a mandate is based on public support, not a private claim. D correctly includes both authority and later public evaluation. Memory cue: mandate gives power; accountability checks its use.
Why does universal adult franchise make elections morally stronger?
Correct answer: A
Correct answer: A. Universal adult franchise means that every adult citizen who meets the legal voting requirement has the right to vote without discrimination based on wealth, gender, caste, religion or education. It expresses the moral idea that each citizen has equal political worth. A rich person's vote is not legally more valuable than a poor person's vote, and a person's social status does not automatically give them extra political power. Option A is correct because it identifies equal political voice as the central principle. B is wrong because restricting voting to the wealthy would create political inequality. C is wrong because excluding women violates equal citizenship. D is wrong because universal franchise expands participation and does not stop counting. This principle does not mean every voter will make the same choice; it means every eligible adult gets an equal opportunity to participate. Memory cue: adult, universal, equal voice—not wealth, status or education.
Why does government accountability weaken if there is no real competition in elections?
Correct answer: A
Correct answer: A. Electoral competition gives voters an alternative and makes those in power worry that poor performance may cost them the next election. Leaders therefore have an incentive to explain decisions, respond to public concerns and improve their work. If there is no genuine competitor, the ruling group may expect to remain in office regardless of its performance. Voters lose a practical way to punish failure, and public pressure becomes weaker. Option A is correct because the absence of a serious challenge reduces the cost of ignoring citizens. B is wrong because genuine competition normally increases, rather than removes, the practical freedom of voter choice. C is wrong because opposition does not automatically become strong without a real contest. D is wrong because transparent counting concerns the procedure for counting votes, not whether leaders face political competition. Competition alone cannot guarantee perfect government, but it is an important condition for accountability. Memory cue: no alternative means less pressure to perform.
Why is secret ballot considered a basic condition of free elections?
Correct answer: C
Correct answer: C. A secret ballot means that no person or group should be able to discover how an individual voted. This privacy protects the voter from threats, punishment, bribery, social pressure or retaliation by candidates, employers, powerful groups or even acquaintances. Because the choice is private, the voter can select a candidate according to personal judgment rather than fear. Secret voting does not mean that the whole election is hidden: election rules, procedures and counting should still be subject to lawful transparency and checks. Option C is correct because secrecy protects the freedom of choice. A is wrong because secrecy does not predetermine results. B is wrong because protecting an individual vote is different from hiding the official counting process. D is wrong because secret ballots are cast by voters, not only by candidates. Memory cue: secret choice, open rules, trustworthy result.
What capacity do independent information and media give voters in elections?
Correct answer: A
Correct answer: A. Voters need reliable and varied information to make a reasoned electoral choice. Independent media and other trustworthy sources can report on candidates, public issues, policies, claims and performance. When voters compare these points, they can judge which option better reflects their concerns instead of deciding only from rumours, slogans or pressure. A is correct because comparison is the practical democratic capacity created by informed access to information. B is wrong because information does not mean avoiding the right to vote. C is wrong because voters cannot legitimately fix the result beforehand; elections determine the result through voting and counting. D is wrong because voters do not control or erase official electoral rolls through media access. Memory cue: good information helps voters compare, judge and choose.
In which direction does policy-based voting take democratic politics?
Correct answer: A
Correct answer: A. Policy-based voting means that voters examine public issues, programmes, promises and the work done by leaders before choosing. This gives parties an incentive to explain their plans and perform well, because voters can reward or reject them on the basis of results. It also moves political discussion away from personal identity, fear or empty slogans and toward public concerns. A is correct because it connects policy-based choice with accountability. B is wrong because heredity and fear are not the basis of policy evaluation. C is wrong because policy-based voting requires meaningful alternatives, not their removal. D is wrong because voting remains central to democratic government. Memory cue: when voters ask “What was promised and what was done?”, accountability grows.
What institutional benefit does formation of opposition after elections give democracy?
Correct answer: A
Correct answer: A. In a democracy, elections produce a government, but democratic control does not stop when voting ends. The opposition represents alternative views inside the legislature and outside it. It can question ministers, examine policies, point out failures, raise citizens’ concerns and offer another programme for the future. This organized criticism helps prevent the ruling side from treating power as unlimited or permanent. A is correct because it describes the opposition’s institutional checking role. B is wrong because opposition does not abolish voter lists. C is wrong because its purpose is not to weaken an independent Election Commission. D is wrong because opposition does not hide the mandate; it accepts the result while scrutinising the government. Memory cue: the government governs, while the opposition questions and checks.
Why does the democratic role of a losing party not end after elections?
Correct answer: A
Correct answer: A. Losing an election means that a party did not receive enough support to form the government on that occasion; it does not remove the party from democratic life. As the opposition, it can represent people who did not choose the ruling party, raise public concerns, question decisions, criticise failures and present alternative policies. These activities help citizens hear different views and keep the government accountable. A is correct because it explains the continuing representative role of a losing party. B is wrong because a losing party cannot cancel a valid result merely by losing. C is wrong because parties do not remove citizens from the electorate. D is wrong because no opposition party stands above the elected government or the law. Memory cue: losing power is not losing the right to participate, question and represent.
Why should elections be understood as a complete process and not only as polling day?
Correct answer: A
Direct answer: A is correct. An election is a sequence of connected democratic stages. First, the voter list identifies eligible voters and constituencies provide the area of representation. Candidates are nominated, and parties or candidates present their programmes during the campaign. Voters then cast their votes, and the votes are counted to determine the result. Each stage affects whether the final result is representative and trustworthy. Option B is wrong because polling is the central act through which citizens choose. Option C is wrong because candidates and parties offer alternatives to voters. Option D is wrong because counting produces the official result. A useful memory chain is: list, nomination, campaign, polling, counting, result. Looking at only polling day can hide problems before or after voting.
Why is the peaceful transfer of power an important result of elections?
Correct answer: A
Direct answer: A is correct. Elections give citizens a recognised method to choose a government and to replace it when another candidate or party receives the required support. When all sides accept the rules and the result, power can change through voting rather than through violence, force, or personal struggle. This makes government change lawful, predictable, and more stable. Option B is wrong because elections are intended to reduce the need for violence, not require it. Option C is wrong because elections provide a limited term or a mandate subject to future elections, not office for life. Option D is wrong because voters are the people who decide which representatives receive authority. Peaceful transfer also allows an opposition to become a government and a former government to accept accountability. Memory cue: elections replace force with consent.
If elections are absent, why will the democratic path for expressing public dissatisfaction become weaker?
Correct answer: A
Direct answer: A is correct. In a democracy, elections allow citizens to evaluate the government and support another party or candidate if they are dissatisfied with its work. This gives public dissatisfaction a regular, lawful, and peaceful channel. Without elections, people cannot use their vote to remove an unpopular government or choose a different representative at the expected time. Their concerns may still be expressed through discussion, petitions, or protest, but the institutional route for changing the government becomes weaker. Option B is wrong because removing elections reduces, rather than increases, meaningful choices. Option C is wrong because a government without the possibility of electoral replacement may face less direct accountability. Option D is wrong because absence of elections can allow power to continue without a regular public decision. Memory cue: elections turn dissatisfaction into peaceful political change.
How does a multi-party electoral system deepen voters’ choice?
Correct answer: A
Direct answer: A is correct. A multi-party system allows different political parties and candidates to present different ideas, priorities, programmes, and styles of leadership. Voters can compare these alternatives and select the one that best matches their concerns or values. The choice is deeper when parties offer meaningful differences, not merely different names. Option B is wrong because a multi-party system permits several parties rather than banning them. Option C is wrong because offering only one candidate removes competition and choice. Option D is wrong because the number of parties does not by itself remove the secrecy of a voter’s ballot. A multi-party system does not guarantee that every option is equally strong or perfect, but it widens the range of available alternatives. Memory cue: more parties can mean more programmes to compare.
If the programmes of all parties are almost the same, how will the quality of electoral choice be affected?
Correct answer: A
Direct answer: A is correct. Elections are more meaningful when voters can compare different policies and decide which programme they prefer. If all parties offer nearly identical programmes, changing the party may not provide a clear change in policy direction. Voters may still choose between candidates because of leadership, local work, or other reasons, but the policy-based range of choice becomes narrow. Option B is wrong because formal freedom to vote does not automatically create meaningful alternatives when programmes are alike. Option C is wrong because votes must still be counted to determine the result. Option D is wrong because democracy is not completely strengthened merely by holding an election with very similar programmes. The important distinction is between having several names on the ballot and having several meaningful policy choices. Memory cue: many parties are not enough; voters also need clear alternatives.
Why can voting be called both a right and a responsibility?
Correct answer: A
Direct answer: A is correct. Voting is a right because eligible citizens are entitled to participate in choosing their representatives, subject to the election rules. It is also a responsibility because the choice made by each voter contributes to the formation of a government and to decisions that affect society. A responsible voter learns about candidates and issues, thinks independently, and votes without coercion or improper inducement. Option B is wrong because voting is a public democratic act, not merely entertainment. Option C is wrong because voting does not end citizenship; it is one way citizens exercise their political membership. Option D is wrong because votes are counted and collectively help determine the result. One vote may seem small, but millions of votes together decide representation. Memory cue: voting is a right to participate and a responsibility to choose thoughtfully.
If voters lose the power to remove representatives which foundation of representative democracy weakens?
Correct answer: A
Direct answer: A, accountability of representatives. In representative democracy, citizens give representatives the authority to make decisions, but representatives are expected to answer for their actions. The possibility of losing an election or being replaced gives them an important reason to listen to citizens, explain decisions, and work responsibly. If voters have no effective way to remove or replace poor representatives, those representatives may become less responsive because their power is not connected to public approval. Option A is correct because accountability means being answerable and facing consequences for performance. Option B is only an administrative detail and does not determine whether representatives answer to citizens. Option C concerns eligibility rules, not the responsibility of elected people. Option D is irrelevant to democratic control. Removal normally occurs through the proper electoral process rather than arbitrary action. Memory cue: the power to replace representatives helps keep them answerable.
If people's choice in elections does not get policy direction in governance which function of elections weakens?
Correct answer: A
Direct answer: A, the function of turning the public mandate into policy. Elections do more than select individuals. Through voting, citizens express preferences about leadership, issues, and broad directions of governance. The elected government is expected to use that mandate while making policies, implementing programmes, and responding to public needs within constitutional and legal limits. If public choice has no connection with policy direction, elections become only a procedure for selecting office-holders, and the link between citizens’ preferences and government action becomes weak. Option A is correct because it describes this representative and policy-making connection. Option B is wrong because voter age is generally set by law, not decided as the main policy function of an election. Option C is an administrative task, not the democratic purpose being tested. Option D is unrelated to governance. A mandate is not permission to ignore rights or minority concerns; elected leaders must still follow law and constitutional principles. Memory cue: elections should connect people’s choice with government direction.
If real choice, free voting, and fair counting all exist in an election, which democratic foundation is strengthened?
Correct answer: A
Correct answer: A, real consent of the people. Democracy means that people should have a genuine opportunity to choose their representatives. First, real choice means that voters can select between meaningful alternatives. Second, free voting means that no one forces, threatens, or improperly influences them. Third, fair counting ensures that the votes cast are recorded and converted into the correct result. Together, these conditions show the public will and give the government democratic legitimacy. A is correct because the government can claim to represent people only when their choice is genuine. B is wrong because hereditary power is based on birth, not public choice. C is wrong because secret rule hides power from citizens rather than reflecting their will. D is wrong because active participation, not passivity, is required. Memory cue: free choice plus fair counting equals genuine public consent.
Google Analytics helps us understand site usage. Google may send limited cookie-free signals before your choice. The Live Visitors widget operates independently of this analytics choice; see the privacy policy for its provider and fallback details. Essential site features work without analytics cookies. You can change your choice later in Privacy choices. Privacy policy