Muft Shiksha™ एक 100% Free Education Portal है 🇮🇳, जिसका उद्देश्य Class 9–12 के हर विद्यार्थी तक High-Quality Education को पूरी तरह मुफ्त पहुँचाना है। 🇮🇳 हम मानते हैं कि अच्छी शिक्षा किसी student की आर्थिक स्थिति पर निर्भर नहीं होनी चाहिए। 🇮🇳 हर विद्यार्थी को वही Quality Study Material, MCQs, Quizzes, Exam Preparation, Concept-Based Learning और Bilingual Support मिलना चाहिए, जो आमतौर पर महंगी Coaching या Premium Platforms में मिलता है। Muft Shiksha™ 🇮🇳 इसी सोच के साथ बनाया गया है
In Class 9 Civics, under the chapter Electoral Politics, Why Do We Need Elections? explains why elections are essential in a democracy. Students learn how citizens choose representatives, hold governments accountable, replace leaders peacefully when needed, and give legitimacy to the government. The topic also highlights voting as a means for people to express their choices and expectations.
TOPIC PRACTICE
Quiz this set
Up to 25 questions from this page. Select your focus, then start.
25 questions
Choose questions
Medium · Level 1View options
Popular representation
Weather forecast
Market control
Family system
Medium · Level 1View options
Because all citizens cannot directly take part in every decision
Because citizens must be kept away from governance
Because elections end democracy
Because representatives are always decided by birth
Medium · Level 1View options
By making the government permanent forever
By giving people a chance to change the government next time
By removing the role of voters
By making candidates win without contest
Medium · Level 1View options
Opportunity to stay above law
Opportunity to stop voting
Opportunity to evaluate policies and leaders
Opportunity to make power hereditary
Medium · Level 1View options
Voters will become more free
Government will become more connected with people
Need for political parties will end
Rulers may become less accountable to people
Medium · Level 1View options
Because it gives voters a real choice
Because it ends the right to vote
Because it makes only one party rule
Because it hides public opinion
Medium · Level 1View options
Hereditary power
Political equality
Religious rule
Secret rule
Medium · Level 1View options
They always keep losers in power
They do not let voting remain secret
They provide a process to accept people's decision
They remove all parties from elections
Medium · Level 1View options
Because the leader never spoke to people
Because there is no option in elections
Because the voter was stopped from voting
Because the voter is satisfied with the leader's work and policies
Medium · Level 1View options
Counting of votes
Real choice to choose
Voter list
Polling station
Medium · Level 1View options
By keeping people outside governance
By deciding the ruler by birth
By showing approval of governance through voting
By making the government permanent
Medium · Level 1View options
Because elections only give a holiday
Because the government writes an exam paper
Because the polling station is in a school
Because people can support or oppose the government's work
Medium · Level 1View options
On a free and fair process
Only on the ruler's wish
On frightening voters
On stopping opposition parties
Medium · Level 1View options
Blind voting
Informed voting
Forced voting
Hereditary voting
Medium · Level 1View options
They end the right to vote
They keep people silent
They present policies and choices in an organised form
They always rule without elections
Medium · Level 1View options
Damaging the polling station
Hiding the voter list
Using violence
Voting for another candidate or party
Medium · Level 1View options
He may pay more attention to people's needs
He becomes completely separate from people
He cancels elections
He stops counting votes
Medium · Level 1View options
Because they always get office even after losing
Because people do not vote
Because there is no other candidate
Because voters can choose another option for poor work
Medium · Level 1View options
Because the losing party always rules
Because it stops voting
Because it respects people's decision and peaceful transfer of power
Because it ends opposition
Medium · Level 1View options
Because leaders seek support from voters
Because voters are separate from governance
Because people remain silent in elections
Because voters have no right
Medium · Level 1View options
Preparing a voter list
Fixing accountability
Decorating polling stations
Celebrating a festival
Medium · Level 1View options
Because voters cannot really choose among different policies or candidates
Because voters become too free
Because people’s control increases
Because political participation becomes stronger
Medium · Level 1View options
By keeping power in one family
By giving the ability to choose and remove representatives
By stopping people from voting
By banning opposition parties
Medium · Level 1View options
They can make government permanent without people
They can give people a chance to change the government
They can end voting
They can make opposition illegal
Medium · Level 1View options
Understanding candidates and issues before deciding
Staying away from the polling station
Choosing the same leader every time
Stopping vote counting
Question 1MediumLevel 1
If the constitution does not provide an election process, which aspect of democracy will weaken?
Correct answer: A
Correct answer: A, popular representation. Elections provide a recognised method through which citizens choose representatives and replace them when they lose public confidence. If the constitution gives no basic election process or rules, it becomes unclear how public authority is selected, how citizens' preferences are expressed and how leaders are held accountable. Option A is correct because representation is the democratic aspect directly affected. Option B is wrong because weather forecasting is unrelated to choosing a government. Option C is wrong because market control is not the central democratic function described here. Option D is wrong because family arrangements are unrelated to political representation. Memory cue: elections convert citizens' preferences into public representation.
Why is electoral representation needed instead of direct democracy in a large country?
Correct answer: A
The correct answer is A: all citizens cannot directly take part in every decision. A large country has a very large population, wide geographical areas, and many complex public matters. It is not practical for every citizen to gather and decide each law, budget, or policy personally. Electoral representation provides a workable arrangement: citizens choose representatives, and those representatives discuss and make decisions in legislatures on behalf of the people. Citizens still participate by voting, expressing opinions, questioning leaders, and replacing representatives in elections. B is wrong because representation is not meant to exclude citizens; it creates a practical channel for their participation. C is wrong because elections are a central method of representative democracy, not its end. D is wrong because democratic representatives are chosen through elections, not automatically by birth. Memory cue: large population plus many decisions requires elected representatives.
How do elections make the government accountable to the people?
Correct answer: B
The correct answer is B: elections give people an opportunity to change the government at the next election. Accountability means that those who exercise public power must answer to the people and face consequences for their performance. During an election, citizens can assess policies and work, listen to competing candidates, and decide whether to continue supporting the governing party or choose an alternative. The possibility of losing office encourages the government to pay attention to public needs and explain its decisions. A is wrong because a government that remains permanent would have little electoral pressure. C is wrong because removing voters destroys the main democratic check on government. D is wrong because an election without competition removes meaningful choice. Memory cue: the power to replace a government makes it answerable.
Elections are not only a process of choosing representatives but also which opportunity for the people?
Correct answer: C
The correct answer is C: elections give people an opportunity to evaluate policies and leaders. An election is not only a selection event; it is also a public review of the work and promises of those seeking power. Voters can compare parties, candidates, programmes, and past performance. They may reward satisfactory work by voting for the incumbent or express dissatisfaction by choosing another candidate. A is wrong because democratic citizens and leaders remain subject to the law; elections do not place anyone above it. B is wrong because elections depend on people’s participation through voting rather than stopping it. D is wrong because elections are based on public choice, not automatic inheritance of power. The evaluation may not be perfectly informed in every case, but the democratic opportunity exists. Memory cue: elections mean selection plus evaluation—choose a representative and judge the available policies and record.
If elections are not held at regular intervals what will be the most direct effect on democracy?
Correct answer: D
The correct answer is D: rulers may become less accountable to the people. Regular elections allow citizens to review the government’s performance and decide whether to keep or replace it. If elections are delayed indefinitely or not held regularly, rulers do not face a timely test of public approval. This can weaken the people’s ability to influence government and reduce the pressure on rulers to explain decisions or respond to public needs. A is wrong because removing regular elections does not automatically increase voter freedom; it removes an important choice. B is wrong because without a recurring public check, the government may become less responsive, not necessarily more connected. C is wrong because political parties may still exist even when elections are irregular. D is the direct democratic danger. Memory cue: no regular election means no regular public review, and weaker review means weaker accountability.
Why is the presence of many candidates important for democracy in elections?
Correct answer: A
The correct answer is A: many candidates give voters a real choice. Democracy requires citizens to be able to compare alternatives and express a preference. Different candidates may offer different policies, priorities, experiences, or approaches to public problems. When more than one candidate contests, voters can support the person or programme they consider most suitable, or reject the current representative. A large number alone does not guarantee a perfect election, but genuine competition makes choice meaningful. B is wrong because candidates and competition support, rather than end, the right to vote. C is wrong because many candidates do not automatically produce one-party rule; they usually provide alternatives. D is wrong because a competitive election helps public preferences become visible through votes. Memory cue: competition creates choice; choice makes voting meaningful.
Which value is strengthened by the idea of one person one vote in democratic elections?
Correct answer: B
The correct answer is B: political equality. The principle of one person, one vote, one value means that each eligible citizen’s vote should have equal importance in choosing representatives. It rejects the idea that a person’s political influence should depend on wealth, family status, caste, religion, gender, or social position. Political equality does not mean that all citizens have identical opinions or circumstances; it means that the voting power recognised in the election is equal. A is wrong because hereditary power gives importance to birth rather than equal public choice. C is wrong because the principle concerns equal political participation, not rule by a religion. D is wrong because secrecy of the ballot protects voters, but it is not the value identified by equal voting power. Memory cue: one person, one vote, one equal political voice.
How do elections help make change of power peaceful?
Correct answer: C
Correct answer: C, elections provide a process for accepting the people’s decision. In a democracy, citizens vote among competing candidates or parties. Votes are counted according to established rules, and the candidate or party that wins is allowed to form the government. The losing side accepts the result because the process gives the decision public legitimacy and offers another opportunity to compete in a future election. This replaces force, violence, or hereditary succession with a peaceful transfer of authority. A is wrong because losers do not always remain in power; usually the winner forms the government. B is wrong because secret voting protects voter choice and supports fairness. D is wrong because democratic elections allow parties to compete. Memory cue: elections turn political disagreement into a lawful change of government.
Correct answer: D. A voter may re-elect a leader after judging the leader’s earlier performance, policies, promises, and public work. Elections give citizens a chance to reward a representative whose work they consider useful or satisfactory. Re-election is not automatic: the voter remains free to choose another candidate if the leader has performed poorly. A is wrong because avoiding communication with people is not a reason to support a leader. B is wrong because elections are meaningful only when voters have a choice among candidates or parties. C is wrong because preventing a person from voting violates democratic participation and cannot justify re-election. A useful memory cue is: good performance may earn another term, but the final choice belongs to voters.
If voters have only one candidate in an election, which feature of elections becomes weak?
Correct answer: B
Correct answer: B, the real choice available to voters becomes weak. An election is democratic when citizens can choose between candidates or parties with different programmes. If only one candidate is available, voters cannot compare alternatives or replace that candidate through a normal contest. Voting and counting may still take place, but the essential element of meaningful competition is missing. A is wrong because votes can still be counted even when there is one candidate. C is wrong because the voter list records eligible voters and does not itself create competition. D is wrong because a polling station is only the place where voting occurs. The issue is not the place or counting procedure; it is the absence of an alternative. Memory cue: no rival means no real choice.
How do elections connect people's consent with governance?
Correct answer: C
Correct answer: C. Consent means that people accept or support who should represent them and how they should be governed. In an election, citizens express this consent through their votes. They may support the existing government, choose a new representative, or reject a party’s policies. The elected government receives democratic authority because it has been chosen through a recognised voting process, although it must still follow the Constitution, laws, and citizens’ rights. A is wrong because elections bring people into political decision-making instead of excluding them. B is wrong because democracy does not decide rulers by birth. D is wrong because governments must remain accountable and can be changed. Memory cue: vote is the citizen’s formal voice of consent.
Why can elections be called a performance test for government?
Correct answer: D
Correct answer: D. During elections, voters can review a government’s record and decide whether to support it again or choose another party or representative. They may consider public services, policies, promises, decisions, and how the government responded to people’s needs. In this sense, an election works like a performance test: public approval can help a government continue, while dissatisfaction can lead to its replacement. It is not a perfect or purely technical test, because voters may consider many issues and different experiences. A is wrong because elections are not merely holidays. B is wrong because the government does not sit for a school examination. C is irrelevant; a polling station’s location does not explain democratic accountability. Memory cue: voters judge, votes record the judgment.
On what does the legitimacy of elections in democracy depend?
Correct answer: A
Correct answer: A. Elections are legitimate when citizens can participate freely, choose among genuine alternatives, and have their votes counted honestly under known rules. A free process means voters and candidates can take part without improper pressure, threats, or unreasonable restrictions. A fair process means competing parties receive a meaningful opportunity and the result reflects the votes rather than manipulation. B is wrong because legitimacy cannot depend only on the ruler’s wish. C is wrong because fear prevents free consent and damages the credibility of the result. D is wrong because excluding opposition removes real competition. Free and fair does not mean that everyone gets the same result; it means that the rules and opportunities allow the people’s choice to be expressed. Memory cue: legitimacy needs freedom plus fairness.
If a voter compares candidates' policies, what kind of voting is being done?
Correct answer: B
Correct answer: B, informed voting. An informed voter seeks knowledge about candidates, party programmes, policies, records, and likely effects before choosing. Comparing policies helps the voter decide which option best matches public needs and personal democratic judgment. It does not require knowing every detail, but it does require thinking instead of voting only because of fear, family pressure, habit, or an unverified claim. A is wrong because blind voting means choosing without adequate thought or information. C is wrong because forced voting happens under pressure and is not a free decision. D is wrong because voting is not inherited like property; each eligible citizen makes an individual choice. A safe memory cue is: compare, think, then vote. Informed voting strengthens accountability because representatives know that citizens can evaluate their choices.
Why is the role of political parties important in elections?
Correct answer: C
Correct answer: C. Political parties bring together people with related ideas and present organised programmes, policies, and candidates to voters. This makes it easier for citizens to compare alternatives and understand what different groups propose for governing the country or locality. Parties also contest elections, form governments when successful, and provide an opposition when they lose, helping democratic accountability. A is wrong because parties normally participate in elections and do not end the right to vote. B is wrong because parties seek public support and communicate with citizens, even though particular campaign practices can be criticised. D is wrong because a democratic party must seek authority through elections and remain accountable to voters. Parties do not remove the need for individual judgment; voters should still examine their programmes and record. Memory cue: parties organise choices; voters make the choice.
What is the democratic way for people to show disagreement in elections?
Correct answer: D
Correct answer: D. Elections provide a peaceful method for expressing disagreement: a voter can choose a different candidate or party. This choice communicates that the voter does not approve of the current representative or a particular programme, while still respecting the law and the rights of other citizens. A is wrong because damaging a polling station attacks the democratic process and may prevent others from voting. B is wrong because hiding the voter list obstructs participation and election administration. C is wrong because violence replaces public choice with fear and can injure people and destroy democratic trust. Voting for another option does not guarantee that one’s preferred candidate will win, but it is the lawful way to register dissent. Memory cue: disagree with a vote, not with violence.
If a leader knows that he has to go back to the people, what effect does it have on his behaviour?
Correct answer: A
Direct answer: A is correct. In a representative democracy, a leader receives authority through the votes of the people. When the next election approaches, the leader knows that citizens can judge the work done by the government and may choose another candidate or party. This possibility makes the leader answerable to the public. Therefore, the leader has a reason to listen to problems, explain decisions, improve services and respond to public needs. Option A is correct because attention to people can help the leader win their support again. B is wrong because elections connect leaders with citizens rather than separating them. C is wrong because the leader cannot cancel elections simply because another election is approaching. D is wrong because vote counting is an official part of the election process and is not stopped for this reason. Memory cue: the possibility of losing votes creates accountability, not isolation.
Why does competition in elections encourage leaders to work better?
Correct answer: D
Direct answer: D is correct. Electoral competition gives citizens a choice between candidates or parties. A leader who wants to remain in office must consider that voters may compare the government's performance with alternatives and vote for someone else. This possibility encourages leaders to respond to public concerns, fulfil reasonable promises and improve their work. D is correct because it connects competition with the voters' power to replace a poorly performing leader. A is wrong because a losing candidate does not automatically receive office. B is wrong because the reasoning depends on people using their voting power, not on their absence from elections. C is wrong because competition requires more than one meaningful option. Competition alone does not guarantee perfect government, and it can sometimes create pressure for attractive promises, but it creates accountability by making re-election uncertain. Memory cue: real competition means poor performance can cost a leader the next election.
Why is accepting defeat in elections necessary for democracy?
Correct answer: C
Direct answer: C is correct. Elections allow citizens to decide which candidate or party should receive the authority to govern. If the losing side accepts a lawful result, power can pass to the winner without violence or a breakdown of constitutional procedures. This respects the voters' decision and makes future elections possible. C is correct because democratic government depends not only on voting but also on respecting the result and allowing peaceful transfer of power. A is wrong because the losing party does not always rule; normally the winning side forms the government, subject to the relevant system. B is wrong because accepting defeat does not stop voting; it protects the continuing electoral process. D is wrong because the opposition remains important for criticism, scrutiny and presenting alternatives. Acceptance does not mean that every result can never be questioned; lawful complaints and review may exist, but disagreement must be handled through democratic rules rather than violence. Memory cue: accept the result, keep democracy peaceful.
Direct answer: A is correct. During an election campaign, candidates and parties ask citizens for votes and support. In return, citizens can ask about earlier promises, public services, policies, spending and future plans. This interaction makes leaders answerable and helps voters make an informed choice. A is correct because a person who seeks the people's political support must explain why the people should trust and elect them. B is wrong because voters are central to choosing representatives and are not separate from democratic governance. C is wrong because questioning, discussion and public evaluation are important parts of an election; silence is not the reason for accountability. D is wrong because eligible voters possess political rights, including the right to participate and choose representatives, subject to election law. Questions alone do not guarantee honest leadership, so voters should also compare records and promises. Memory cue: if leaders ask for votes, citizens may ask for answers.
If voters do not vote for a party because it failed to fulfil promises, which function of elections is shown?
Correct answer: B
Correct answer: B, fixing accountability. In a democracy, elected representatives and political parties are expected to work according to the promises and policies presented to voters. Elections give citizens a peaceful way to judge this work. If a party performs poorly or breaks important promises, voters may refuse to support it in the next election. In this way, leaders understand that they must answer to the people and may lose office if they ignore public expectations. Option A is about identifying eligible voters, not judging a party’s performance. Option C is only a local arrangement and has no relation to political responsibility. Option D is unrelated to elections. Memory cue: broken promises followed by loss of votes means accountability.
Why does democracy weaken when there is no real choice in elections?
Correct answer: A
Correct answer: A. Democracy depends on meaningful choice. Elections are democratic only when voters can compare different candidates, parties, or policies and select the one they prefer. If there is only one approved option, or all options are effectively the same and voters cannot reject the ruling group, voting becomes a formality rather than genuine public control. Option B is wrong because freedom is a strength of democracy, not a weakness. Option C describes the opposite of the situation: people’s control decreases when choice disappears. Option D is also opposite, because participation becomes less meaningful without competition. A real election allows voters both to choose a government and to replace it. Memory cue: no alternative means no effective choice, and no effective choice weakens democracy.
How do elections give people control over power in a democracy?
Correct answer: B
Correct answer: B. Elections give citizens a peaceful and regular method to choose representatives who will exercise public power. Before voting, people can compare candidates and parties; after a term, they can judge the government’s work. If representatives fail to perform or lose public trust, voters can support another candidate or party in the next election. This possibility of replacement makes rulers answerable and prevents power from being treated as a permanent personal possession. Option A concentrates power in one family and removes public choice. Option C takes away the basic democratic act of voting. Option D destroys competition and prevents people from considering alternatives. Memory cue: choose, judge, and replace—that is electoral control.
If a government ignores public opinion, what correction can elections make?
Correct answer: B
Correct answer: B. Elections provide a constitutional and peaceful method for citizens to respond when a government ignores public opinion. Voters can examine its record, compare other parties or candidates, and support an alternative in the next election. If enough voters make that choice, a different government or set of representatives may come to power. This possibility encourages the government to listen to citizens and remain accountable. Option A would remove public control and is undemocratic. Option C is the opposite of the purpose of elections, because voting is the main way citizens express their choice. Option D suppresses criticism and destroys democratic competition. Memory cue: ignored public opinion can produce a changed government through the ballot.
The role of a voter in elections is not only casting a vote but also what?
Correct answer: A
Correct answer: A. Voting is meaningful when it is based on an informed and thoughtful decision. A responsible voter learns about the candidates, their past work, their policies, important public issues, and their likely ability to represent people. The voter can then compare alternatives and choose according to judgment rather than pressure, rumour, or habit. Option B means avoiding participation and cannot improve democratic representation. Option C is not always responsible because a voter should judge performance afresh instead of supporting someone automatically. Option D interferes with the lawful process that determines the result. Being informed does not require knowing everything; it means checking relevant facts and thinking carefully. Memory cue: a good voter does not merely vote; a good voter understands before choosing.
Google Analytics helps us understand site usage. Google may send limited cookie-free signals before your choice. The Live Visitors widget operates independently of this analytics choice; see the privacy policy for its provider and fallback details. Essential site features work without analytics cookies. You can change your choice later in Privacy choices. Privacy policy