Muft Shiksha™ एक 100% Free Education Portal है 🇮🇳, जिसका उद्देश्य Class 9–12 के हर विद्यार्थी तक High-Quality Education को पूरी तरह मुफ्त पहुँचाना है। 🇮🇳 हम मानते हैं कि अच्छी शिक्षा किसी student की आर्थिक स्थिति पर निर्भर नहीं होनी चाहिए। 🇮🇳 हर विद्यार्थी को वही Quality Study Material, MCQs, Quizzes, Exam Preparation, Concept-Based Learning और Bilingual Support मिलना चाहिए, जो आमतौर पर महंगी Coaching या Premium Platforms में मिलता है। Muft Shiksha™ 🇮🇳 इसी सोच के साथ बनाया गया है
In this Class 9 Civics topic from Electoral Politics, students learn how candidates enter an election through nomination, including submitting nomination papers, meeting eligibility requirements, and facing scrutiny. They examine how election campaigns allow parties and candidates to present policies, promises, and manifestos, contact voters, and debate public issues. The topic also explains why campaign rules and the Model Code of Conduct are needed to limit unfair influence, misuse of government resources, hate speech, and excessive spending, helping voters make informed choices.
Practice questions
01 If a candidate is stopped from campaigning within rules what effect will it have on voters’ choice?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: A. Voters will not fully know that candidate’s policies and views
Explanation: Answer: A. Campaigning gives candidates an opportunity to present their policies, explain their priorities and respond to voters’ concerns. It also gives voters information with which they can compare competing candidates. If a candidate is prevented from carrying out lawful campaign activity, voters may not hear that candidate’s views or proposals fully. A is correct because restricted lawful campaigning reduces the information available for an informed choice. B is wrong because campaign freedom does not update the voter list. C is wrong because the speed of counting is a separate administrative matter. D is wrong because the legal voting age is not changed by a campaign restriction. This does not mean every form of campaigning is allowed: threats, bribery, hate speech and other prohibited conduct may be restricted. The key distinction is between lawful campaign expression and unlawful conduct. Memory cue: fair choice requires fair access to lawful information.
02 Together what do expenditure limit and code of conduct strengthen in campaigns?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: B. Fair and rule-based electoral contest
Explanation: Answer: B. An expenditure limit places a ceiling on campaign spending, while a code of conduct sets standards for acceptable campaign behaviour. Together, these measures can reduce the unfair influence of money and discourage practices such as intimidation, personal abuse or appeals that violate election rules. They help candidates compete within a common framework and give voters a better chance to hear issues rather than seeing the contest dominated by wealth or improper conduct. B is correct because it describes the shared democratic purpose of both measures. A is wrong because neither rule concerns school examinations. C is wrong because these campaign rules are not a general tax system. D is wrong because they have nothing to do with weather reporting. These rules work best when they are clearly applied and monitored impartially. Memory cue: spending limits control money power; the code controls campaign conduct.
03 While reading a manifesto what should voters see besides promises?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: C. Policy direction and practicality
Explanation: Answer: C. A manifesto presents a party’s or candidate’s proposed policies and priorities. Voters should therefore look beyond attractive promises and ask what direction the policies take, which problems they address, how they might be implemented and whether the available resources make them reasonably practical. They can compare the promises with the candidate’s stated priorities and consider possible effects on different groups. C is correct because policy direction and practicality help voters judge the substance of a manifesto. A is wrong because ballot-paper colour does not reveal the quality of a policy. B is wrong because a polling-station wall is irrelevant to the promises. D is wrong because a candidate’s position in a queue does not explain the manifesto. This does not require voters to predict the future perfectly; it means they should read critically rather than accepting every promise automatically. Memory cue: read a manifesto for both “what is promised” and “how it can be done.”
04 If a candidate’s past work contradicts the promises made during the current campaign, what can voters do?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: D. They can evaluate the candidate’s credibility
Explanation: Correct answer: D, voters can evaluate the candidate’s credibility. First, voters should understand that a promise is only a claim about future action, while past work gives evidence about how the candidate has acted before. They can compare completed projects, public statements, conduct, and the practicality of new promises. If the two do not match, voters may question whether the promises are reliable and then decide freely. A is wrong because voter lists are prepared through an official electoral process, not ended by voters during a campaign. B is wrong because delimitation means changing constituency boundaries and is not a response to contradictory promises. C is wrong because vote counting is conducted under election rules and cannot be changed by ordinary voters. D is correct because judging credibility helps voters make an informed choice. Memory cue: compare “promise” with “performance”; words alone are not proof.
05 Why is it necessary for different views to reach voters during an election campaign?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: A. So that voters can compare them and make an informed choice
Explanation: Correct answer: A, different views allow voters to compare alternatives and make an informed choice. In a campaign, candidates explain their policies, priorities, and possible solutions. When voters hear more than one viewpoint, they can ask which plan is practical, whose priorities match public needs, and how candidates differ. This makes electoral choice meaningful rather than based only on slogans or one-sided information. B is wrong because a campaign does not remove all candidates; it gives eligible candidates an opportunity to seek support. C is wrong because campaigns should help voters prepare for voting, not close polling stations. D is wrong because hearing different views is not a reason to reject nominations. A is correct because comparison is central to democratic electoral choice. Memory cue: more viewpoints mean a better-informed comparison, not automatic agreement with every view.
06 If only the ruling party’s achievements are shown at government expense during a campaign, what concern arises?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: A. Concern about fair campaigning and misuse of government resources
Explanation: Correct answer: A, this raises concern about an unfair campaign and misuse of government resources. Government resources belong to public institutions, not to one party’s private campaign. If public money, official publicity, or government machinery is used mainly to promote the ruling party, other candidates may not receive an equal opportunity to present their views. Voters may also find it difficult to separate public information from party promotion. B is wrong because the issue is not whether voters meet the age requirement. C is wrong because the language of the voter list does not address unequal campaign publicity. D is wrong because the condition of a polling-station roof is unrelated to campaign fairness. A is correct because democratic competition requires a fair opportunity and responsible use of public resources. Memory cue: public money should serve the public, not provide an unfair party advantage.
07 In which situation would a candidate’s declaration be most useful to voters?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: A. When it contains correct and complete information
Explanation: Correct answer: A, a declaration is most useful when it gives correct and complete information. Voters need reliable facts about a candidate so they can compare candidates and judge their suitability. Complete information makes the decision more informed; hidden or incomplete details can prevent voters from understanding the candidate properly. B is wrong because hiding information reduces transparency. C is wrong because a slogan expresses an appealing message but does not provide enough facts for careful evaluation. D is wrong because a voter list is an electoral document, not the main content needed in a candidate’s declaration. A is correct because truthful disclosure supports accountability and informed choice. Memory cue: a declaration should inform voters, not merely impress them. “Complete and correct” is more useful than “catchy and incomplete.”
08 If misinformation spreads widely during a campaign, what problem remains even when voting is free?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: A. The voter’s informed decision will be weakened
Explanation: Correct answer: A, misinformation weakens the voter’s ability to make an informed decision. Free voting means that voters can cast their vote without being forced, but meaningful choice also requires access to reasonably accurate information. False claims may create an incorrect image of a candidate, hide important facts, or make voters judge policies unfairly. B is wrong because misinformation does not automatically remove polling stations. C is wrong because the sequence of voting and counting is not changed by campaign rumours. D is wrong because nominations remain part of the election process. A is correct because freedom from force and access to trustworthy information are both important for meaningful democratic choice. Memory cue: “free vote” is not the same as “well-informed vote”; democracy needs both freedom and reliable information.
09 Why should policy-based debate and a candidate’s declaration be studied together during campaigns?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: A. Both help voters decide about policies and the candidate
Explanation: Correct answer: A, the two sources together help voters judge both the proposed policies and the person who seeks office. A policy debate explains what a candidate or party wants to do and how it proposes to address public problems. A declaration provides relevant information about the candidate, helping voters consider responsibility and suitability. Looking at only policies may ignore the candidate’s record, while looking only at personal information may ignore the programme being offered. B is wrong because neither activity stops counting. C is wrong because constituency boundaries are not changed by campaign debate or declarations. D is wrong because voter lists are not erased through these activities. A is correct because informed voting requires attention to both programme and candidate. Memory cue: evaluate “the plan” and “the person” together.
10 If a candidate hides information about serious allegations after nomination, what effect will this have on transparency?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: A. Transparency will weaken, and voters may decide using incomplete information
Explanation: Correct answer: A, hiding relevant information weakens transparency and may leave voters with an incomplete picture. Transparency means that important information is openly available so citizens can examine it before making a decision. A serious allegation is not automatically proof of guilt, so voters should distinguish an allegation from a final legal finding; however, concealing relevant information still prevents open evaluation. B is wrong because secrecy cannot increase transparency. C is wrong because voting age is not changed by a candidate hiding information. D is wrong because constituency size is not altered in this way. A is correct because informed electoral choice depends on honest disclosure. Memory cue: disclosure does not decide guilt; it allows voters to know and assess relevant facts.
11 Threatening voters and giving them money look different, yet what common problem do they create?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: A. Both affect voters’ freedom of choice
Explanation: Correct answer: A, both practices interfere with the voter’s free choice. Threats use fear or pressure, while offering money attempts to influence a decision through an improper benefit. The methods differ, but in both cases the voter may not choose according to independent judgment about policies or candidates. This damages the fairness of electoral competition and weakens the meaning of consent. B is wrong because neither threats nor money creates polling stations. C is wrong because nomination scrutiny checks whether candidates meet procedural requirements; it is not intimidation or inducement. D is wrong because these practices do not improve voter-list accuracy. A is correct because freedom from coercion and improper influence is central to a fair election. Memory cue: fear and bribery are different tools with the same effect—reduced free choice.
12 If issues affecting women or weaker groups are not raised at all during a campaign, what weakness appears?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: A. A lack of inclusive, issue-based discussion
Explanation: Correct answer: A, the campaign would lack inclusive, issue-based discussion. Elections should give citizens an opportunity to hear about concerns affecting different sections of society. If women or weaker groups are completely absent from the discussion, their needs may remain unseen and candidates may not be questioned about equal access, safety, opportunities, or other public concerns. This does not mean every group must support the same policy; it means relevant issues should be allowed into democratic debate. B is wrong because the number of voter lists is unrelated. C is wrong because campaign content does not determine counting speed. D is wrong because a deadline is a procedural matter, not the weakness described. A is correct because inclusive discussion makes representation more meaningful. Memory cue: a democratic campaign should ask, “Whose concerns are being heard, and whose are missing?”
13 When can posters and pamphlets become a problem in an election campaign?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: B. When they spread misinformation or hatred
Explanation: Correct answer: B, posters and pamphlets become a problem when they spread misinformation or hatred. Campaign material can help voters learn about candidates and policies, but its effect depends on whether the content is truthful, responsible, and consistent with election rules. False claims can mislead voters, while hateful material can create hostility against a group and damage respectful democratic debate. A is wrong because correct information shared within rules is a legitimate campaign use. C is wrong because explaining a policy helps voters understand alternatives. D is wrong because valid candidate information can support informed choice. B is correct because misinformation and hatred undermine fair and constructive campaigning. Memory cue: campaign material is not harmful merely because it is printed; the warning signs are falsehood, hatred, and rule-breaking.
14 Which statement best links nomination and campaign with voters' informed decision?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: A. Nomination provides information about candidates, and campaigning takes policies and promises to voters
Explanation: Answer: A. Nomination is the formal process through which eligible candidates enter the election and information about them becomes available. Campaigning then gives candidates an opportunity to present their policies, programmes, achievements and promises to the public. Voters can listen to different candidates, compare their ideas and judge which choice may serve them best. Therefore, nomination supplies information about who is contesting, while campaigning explains what those candidates or parties propose to do. B is wrong because counting takes place after voting, and voting age is fixed by law, not by a campaign. C is wrong because both stages are important parts of an election. D is wrong because voter-list preparation is a separate electoral activity. Memory cue: nomination tells voters “who”; campaign helps them understand “what they propose.”
15 If the final candidate list is declared very late, what effect can it have on campaigning and voter information?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: A. Voters may get less time to compare candidates
Explanation: Answer: A. After nominations are filed, they are examined and withdrawals, where allowed, are completed; then the final list of contesting candidates is declared. This final list is important because voters need to know exactly who is contesting before they compare candidates and their policies. Campaigning also needs reasonable time so that candidates can communicate with people and voters can ask questions, check claims and form an informed opinion. If the list appears very late, the available time for such comparison and communication may become shorter. B is unrelated: a late final list does not automatically correct the voter list. C does not follow, because counting occurs after polling and is governed by a separate schedule. D is also wrong: late declaration does not by itself end eligibility. Memory cue: a late candidate list means less time for “know, compare and decide.”
16 What is not meant by rule-based campaigning in elections?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: B. Threatening or bribing voters
Explanation: Answer: B. Rule-based campaigning means that candidates and parties must compete within electoral laws and accepted democratic standards. They may explain policies, publish a manifesto and criticise an opponent using relevant facts, but they must not use threats, force, intimidation, bribery or other unfair methods to influence voters. Threatening a voter attacks free choice, while bribery tries to purchase a vote; both damage equal and fair competition. A can be part of legitimate debate when it is factual and not abusive or defamatory. C is a normal way of comparing different programmes. D is also a normal campaign activity because a manifesto presents the party’s proposed policies and promises. Thus B is the practice that is not meant by rule-based campaigning. Memory cue: democratic persuasion uses reasons, not fear or money.
17 In which situation will an election campaign help voters the most?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: A. When it clearly explains policies, achievements, limitations and candidate information
Explanation: Answer: A. An election campaign is most useful when it gives voters relevant, understandable and reasonably balanced information. Voters should be able to learn what a candidate or party has done, what it proposes to do, what difficulties or limitations may exist, and who is responsible for the promises. Such information supports comparison and an informed choice rather than blind loyalty. B is wrong because rumours are unverified and can mislead people. C is wrong because threats suppress free choice and violate democratic conduct. D is wrong because preventing opposing views removes debate and denies voters a chance to hear alternatives. A does not require believing every claim; voters should still check evidence and compare different sources. Memory cue: a helpful campaign informs, explains and allows comparison; it does not frighten, silence or mislead.
18 If a party’s manifesto and campaign speech are very different, what should voters do?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: B. Compare both and consider the clarity of the policy
Explanation: Answer: B. A manifesto is a public document describing a party’s intended policies and programmes, while a campaign speech is what a speaker says while seeking support. If the two differ greatly, voters should compare them carefully instead of accepting either one automatically. They can ask which promises are specific, realistic, consistent and connected to the party’s stated programme; they may also examine the party’s past record and the explanations given by its leaders. This process helps voters judge policy clarity and credibility. A is wrong because disagreement or confusion does not make abstaining the only responsible choice; citizens may still evaluate all options. C is unrelated because the voter list records eligible voters. D is not something an individual voter can simply do because speeches differ. Memory cue: compare the written promise with the spoken promise before deciding.
19 How can the importance of stating a candidate’s educational qualification in a campaign be understood?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: A. It gives voters background information but should not be the only basis of choice
Explanation: Answer: A. Educational qualification is one item of information that may help voters understand a candidate’s background, training and experience. However, it should not be treated as a complete measure of a person’s ability to represent people. Voters should also consider the candidate’s policies, public work, integrity, understanding of local problems, conduct and willingness to remain accountable. A higher qualification by itself does not guarantee good leadership, and a lower qualification by itself does not prove that a candidate cannot serve effectively. B is wrong because sharing information does not stop voting. C is wrong because counting follows voting procedures and is not changed by campaign details. D is wrong because a constituency is an electoral area defined separately. Memory cue: qualification is one piece of evidence, not the whole decision.
20 If campaign expenditure is hidden, what democratic concern arises?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: A. Concern about expenditure transparency and control of money power
Explanation: Answer: A. Campaign expenditure includes money spent to communicate with voters and conduct campaign activities. Rules requiring disclosure or monitoring of such spending help authorities and citizens assess whether the contest is being influenced unfairly by money power. If expenditure is hidden, voters may not know the scale or source of financial support, and wealthy candidates or parties may gain an unfair advantage over others. Hidden spending can also make legal limits and accountability difficult to enforce. B is unrelated because voter age concerns eligibility. C has no bearing on financial fairness. D concerns how electoral boundaries are arranged, not campaign finance. Transparency does not mean that every campaign must spend the same amount; it means relevant spending should be reported and subject to lawful oversight. Memory cue: hidden money means hidden influence, so transparency protects fair competition.
21 If public order completely breaks down during a campaign, which electoral purpose is affected?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: B. Peaceful and rule-based campaigning
Explanation: Answer: B. Campaigning in a democracy should take place peacefully and according to election rules. Public order allows candidates to hold lawful meetings, communicate their ideas and criticise opponents without violence or intimidation. It also allows voters to hear different views and make choices freely. If order completely breaks down, meetings may become unsafe, opponents may be silenced, and voters may be frightened from participating; therefore the purpose of peaceful, rule-based campaigning is directly harmed. A concerns preparation of voter records, which is a different administrative task. C is a legal eligibility matter and is not changed by disorder during a campaign. D concerns counting after polling and is not the immediate purpose mentioned. Memory cue: public order protects safe communication and free choice during the campaign.
22 If eligible candidates are unfairly stopped from nomination while others campaign, why will the election be weak?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: A. Real choices before voters will decrease
Explanation: Answer: A. A meaningful election requires eligible candidates to have a fair opportunity to contest, subject to lawful and equal rules. When qualified candidates are unfairly prevented from filing or completing nomination, voters lose the chance to hear their ideas, compare their records and choose among genuine alternatives. If the remaining candidates campaign without real competition, the election may still occur formally, but its representative and democratic quality becomes weaker. B is wrong because excluding candidates does not make vote counting more accurate. C is unrelated because the voter list records electors, not the number of candidates. D is wrong because voting age is fixed by law and does not change when nominations are blocked. Fair nomination therefore protects both competition and voter choice. Memory cue: fair nomination creates real alternatives; unfair exclusion removes choice.
23 How does the process from nomination to campaigning empower voters?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: A. It gives them a chance to understand candidates’ identity, background, policies and promises
Explanation: Answer: A. Nomination identifies the people who are officially contesting, while campaigning gives them a public opportunity to explain their background, policies, programmes, achievements and promises. Through this process, voters can learn who the candidates are, hear competing viewpoints, compare possible plans and consider which candidate should receive their vote. Empowerment does not mean that the process makes the decision for voters; it means that voters receive information and retain the freedom to judge and choose. B is the opposite of empowerment because voters remain participants in the election. C is wrong because results are known only after polling and counting. D is wrong because being informed does not remove anyone from a constituency. Voters should also check claims and avoid rumours. Memory cue: nomination identifies the choices; campaigning explains the choices; voting is the voter’s decision.
24 On what basis will the most balanced evaluation of nomination and election campaign be made?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: A. Whether candidates got a fair opportunity and voters received accurate information
Explanation: Answer: A, whether candidates received a fair opportunity and voters received accurate information. Nomination is important because it should allow eligible people to enter the contest without unfair exclusion. Campaigning is important because voters need reliable information about candidates, parties, policies and public issues. Therefore, a balanced evaluation examines both sides: fair entry into the contest and informed choice by voters. B is wrong because poster size measures publicity, not fairness or the quality of information. C is wrong because loud slogans may attract attention but do not prove that voters understand the candidates or policies. D is wrong because a democratic contest requires meaningful alternatives, not one-party campaigning. Memory cue: fair entry plus informed choice.
25 If scrutiny of nominations is not fair, which initial condition of electoral democracy is affected first?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: A. Fair entry of eligible candidates
Explanation: Answer: A, fair entry of eligible candidates. Scrutiny is the stage at which nomination papers and the eligibility of candidates are checked. If this examination is biased, a qualified person may be rejected unfairly, or an unsuitable person may be allowed into the contest. That immediately affects whether voters receive a genuine range of choices. B is unrelated because decoration has no bearing on democratic entry. C is wrong because the legal voting age is not changed by nomination scrutiny. D concerns counting, which occurs after polling and is a later stage. The logical sequence is: fair scrutiny, eligible candidates, real alternatives, and then informed voting. Memory cue: fair scrutiny protects fair choice.
Google Analytics helps us understand site usage. Google may send limited cookie-free signals before your choice. The Live Visitors widget operates independently of this analytics choice; see the privacy policy for its provider and fallback details. Essential site features work without analytics cookies. You can change your choice later in Privacy choices. Privacy policy