Muft Shiksha™ एक 100% Free Education Portal है 🇮🇳, जिसका उद्देश्य Class 9–12 के हर विद्यार्थी तक High-Quality Education को पूरी तरह मुफ्त पहुँचाना है। 🇮🇳 हम मानते हैं कि अच्छी शिक्षा किसी student की आर्थिक स्थिति पर निर्भर नहीं होनी चाहिए। 🇮🇳 हर विद्यार्थी को वही Quality Study Material, MCQs, Quizzes, Exam Preparation, Concept-Based Learning और Bilingual Support मिलना चाहिए, जो आमतौर पर महंगी Coaching या Premium Platforms में मिलता है। Muft Shiksha™ 🇮🇳 इसी सोच के साथ बनाया गया है
In this Class 9 Civics topic from Electoral Politics, students learn how candidates enter an election through nomination, including submitting nomination papers, meeting eligibility requirements, and facing scrutiny. They examine how election campaigns allow parties and candidates to present policies, promises, and manifestos, contact voters, and debate public issues. The topic also explains why campaign rules and the Model Code of Conduct are needed to limit unfair influence, misuse of government resources, hate speech, and excessive spending, helping voters make informed choices.
Practice questions
01 Why is peaceful conduct necessary during election campaign?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: A. It protects safety and freedom of both voters and candidates
Explanation: Direct answer: A is correct. A voter must be able to hear different views, attend meetings, speak, travel and vote without fear. Candidates also need the freedom to present their ideas and compete without threats or violence. Peaceful conduct therefore protects personal safety and the independent choice that makes an election democratic. A is correct because it includes both security and freedom for voters and candidates. B is wrong because peaceful behaviour does not erase the electoral roll. C is wrong because it does not cancel nominations. D is wrong because every valid vote continues to have the same value; peaceful conduct does not change that principle. Memory cue: no fear means freer choice and fairer competition.
02 What benefit do voters get when candidate information is public?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: A. They can compare candidates and make an informed decision
Explanation: Direct answer: A is correct. Public candidate information gives voters a basis for comparison. Depending on the required disclosure, voters may examine relevant details such as education, assets, liabilities and declared criminal cases, rather than relying only on slogans or rumours. They can then ask whether a candidate is suitable and use their vote more thoughtfully. A is correct because disclosure supports informed electoral choice. B is wrong: learning information does not remove the right to vote. C is wrong: a voter’s name is not automatically deleted from the roll for this reason. D is wrong: becoming a candidate still requires the legal nomination process. Memory cue: information helps voters judge; it does not change their citizenship or electoral status.
03 Why is the correct sequence of nomination and campaign important in the democratic process?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: A. First the candidates become clear, and then they communicate their ideas to voters.
Explanation: Correct answer: A. Nomination identifies the people who are formally contesting an election. After the final list of candidates is known, those candidates can campaign by explaining their ideas, policies and plans to voters. Voters need this information before voting so that they can compare the available choices and make an informed decision. The order is therefore nomination, campaign, polling and counting. B is wrong because the result can be declared only after voting and counting, not before candidates are selected. C is wrong because counting follows polling and cannot come before campaigning. D reverses the process: nomination must happen before polling. Memory cue: “Name first, explain next, vote after that.”
04 If a candidate does not campaign after nomination, what effect may it have on voters?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: A. Voters will receive less information about the candidate’s policies and plans.
Explanation: Correct answer: A. Campaigning is a way for a candidate to present ideas, policies, past work and plans to the public. If the candidate does not campaign at all, voters may have less opportunity to learn what the candidate stands for. This can make comparison and informed choice more difficult, although voters may still obtain information from other lawful and reliable sources. B is wrong because the number of votes a person may cast is not increased by a candidate’s campaign decision. C is wrong because a voter list is an official electoral record and is not cancelled merely because one candidate does not campaign. D is wrong because the Election Commission is not removed for this reason. Memory cue: campaign means “carry the candidate’s message to citizens.”
05 How does the last date of nomination help the election schedule?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: A. It keeps nomination time-bound and ensures time for later election procedures.
Explanation: Correct answer: A. An announced last date gives every prospective candidate a clear deadline for submitting nomination papers. Once that stage closes, election officials can follow the next scheduled steps, such as checking the papers, allowing withdrawal where applicable, preparing the final list of candidates and arranging the poll. A fixed timetable helps candidates, officials and voters know what happens and when. B is wrong because voter eligibility rules, including the legal age, are not changed by a nomination deadline. C is wrong because the deadline does not permanently ban campaigning; campaigning is regulated by the election schedule and rules. D is wrong because the nomination date does not decide the validity of votes cast during polling. Memory cue: “deadline closes one stage and opens the next.”
06 What is the correct use of social media or posters in an election campaign?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: A. To convey a candidate’s message and policies to voters.
Explanation: Correct answer: A. Social media and posters are communication tools. In a proper campaign, they can explain a candidate’s programme, policies, priorities and public message so that voters can consider the available choices. Their useful democratic purpose is informing citizens, not forcing them. B is wrong because buying votes is an improper and corrupt practice, not legitimate communication. C is wrong because threats and intimidation take away the voter’s freedom to choose. D is wrong because campaign material cannot lawfully alter the counting process; counting is handled through official procedures. Information should also be truthful and follow election rules. Memory cue: campaign media should inform, not purchase, frighten or manipulate votes.
07 If a campaign contains only personal attacks and no discussion of issues, what deficiency will remain?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: A. Voters will receive less policy-based information.
Explanation: Correct answer: A. An election campaign should help citizens understand public issues, proposed policies and possible solutions. Personal attacks focus on an individual rather than explaining how that person or party would govern. Without issue-based discussion, voters have less useful information for comparing programmes and judging which promises may address their concerns. B is wrong because personal attacks do not correct the electoral roll. C is wrong because the number of polling stations is an administrative matter and does not automatically rise because of campaign language. D is wrong because scrutiny of nomination papers is a separate official stage that takes place according to election rules. A healthy campaign may examine a public record, but it should not replace policy discussion with abuse. Memory cue: informed choice needs issues, not insults.
08 How can voters evaluate a candidate’s promises in an election campaign?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: A. By comparing them with past work and policies.
Explanation: Correct answer: A. A promise should be examined rather than accepted merely because it sounds attractive. Voters can compare it with the candidate’s or party’s earlier work, stated policies, record and the practical details of the proposal. They can ask what problem it addresses and whether there is a believable way to carry it out. B is wrong because slogans may be memorable but do not by themselves show a plan or record. C is wrong because the electoral roll only concerns eligibility to vote, not the quality of a candidate’s promises. D is wrong because the result is not known before polling and counting. Memory cue: judge promises with “record, policy and practicality,” not slogans alone.
09 How does public debate among candidates help voters?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: A. It helps voters compare candidates’ ideas and policies.
Explanation: Correct answer: A. In a public debate, candidates can present their positions and respond to questions or criticisms. Voters can hear differences in priorities, policies and reasoning instead of relying only on slogans or isolated claims. This comparison supports an informed electoral choice. A debate does not guarantee that every statement is correct, so voters should still check claims where possible, but it creates a useful opportunity to compare alternatives. B is wrong because debate is part of communication and does not stop the scheduled poll. C is wrong because discussion does not remove the official electoral roll. D is wrong because a debate does not cancel valid nomination papers. Memory cue: debate gives voters “different views side by side.”
10 If a candidate hides information in the affidavit, what will be affected?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: A. The voter’s informed choice and transparency.
Explanation: Correct answer: A. An affidavit is intended to provide relevant information that helps voters assess a candidate. If a candidate hides required information, voters may form an opinion without knowing important facts. This weakens transparency and makes informed choice more difficult. It can also raise questions about compliance with the applicable rules, but the direct democratic harm in this question is reduced voter information. B is wrong because polling-booth numbers are arranged administratively and are not automatically changed by hidden affidavit information. C is wrong because constituency boundaries are determined through a separate delimitation process. D is wrong because a voter’s age is not changed by a candidate’s disclosure. Memory cue: disclosure supports informed choice; concealment weakens it.
11 A party stating its policies in its manifesto is what kind of campaign?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: A. A policy-based campaign.
Explanation: Correct answer: A. A manifesto is a document or public statement in which a party presents its proposed policies, priorities and programmes. When a party asks for support by discussing these plans, the campaign is policy-based. It gives voters material for comparing parties and thinking about possible government action. B is wrong because a fear-based campaign tries to influence people through threats or anxiety rather than explaining policies. C is wrong because offering money or benefits for votes is bribery and is not legitimate policy communication. D is wrong because rigging means manipulating an election, not presenting a manifesto. A manifesto contains proposals, so voters should still consider whether those proposals are practical and credible. Memory cue: manifesto means “what the party plans to do.”
12 Use of public office for personal electoral advantage in a campaign is against what?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: A. Fair electoral competition.
Explanation: Correct answer: A. Fair electoral competition requires candidates and parties to compete under equal and lawful conditions. A person who uses public office, government resources or official influence for personal electoral advantage may gain an unfair benefit over opponents and may blur the line between public service and party campaigning. That damages equality and public trust. B is wrong because voter registration concerns recording eligible voters, not misuse of office. C is wrong because polling-booth distance is an administrative accessibility issue. D is wrong because an election symbol identifies a candidate or party and is not the principle being violated here. The exact legal consequences depend on the applicable election rules, but the democratic principle affected is fairness. Memory cue: public office is for public duty, not private campaign advantage.
13 Why is special care expected from the ruling party when the model code applies?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: A. Because it may have access to government resources
Explanation: Direct answer: A is correct because the ruling party may have access to government vehicles, offices, employees, publicity systems, and other public resources. The model code of conduct applies during an election so that the party in power does not use its official position to gain an unfair advantage. Government resources belong to the public, not to one party. Therefore, ministers and ruling-party leaders must separate official government work from election campaigning and must not use public machinery to promote their party. Option A correctly identifies the possible misuse of government resources. B is wrong because members of the ruling party are voters and can vote. C is wrong because the ruling party normally has candidates. D is wrong because the issue is not inability to see voter lists; electoral authorities prepare and manage them under rules. Memory cue: power plus public resources requires extra restraint.
14 How is checking candidate eligibility in nomination connected with voters' interest?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: A. It gives voters a choice among valid candidates
Explanation: Direct answer: A is correct. During nomination, election authorities check whether a person satisfies the required legal conditions and whether the nomination papers are properly completed. This screening does not choose the winner; it ensures that the names placed before voters follow the prescribed rules. As a result, voters can compare candidates who are legally eligible to contest. This protects the meaning of voter choice and reduces confusion about invalid nominations. B is wrong because checking a candidate's eligibility does not remove an ordinary voter's name from the electoral roll. C is wrong because scrutiny of nominations does not close a polling station. D is wrong because the value of each vote is not changed by candidate scrutiny. Memory cue: nomination scrutiny checks the candidate, while the voter list records the voter.
15 If the nomination process is not transparent what effect will it have on electoral competition?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: A. Doubt and inequality in candidate selection may increase
Explanation: Direct answer: A is correct. Transparency means that nomination rules, required documents, scrutiny, and reasons for accepting or rejecting nominations are open and understandable. If this process is hidden or applied inconsistently, people may suspect favouritism, unfair exclusion, or special treatment for powerful candidates. Such doubt can weaken trust and make competition unequal before voting even begins. B is wrong because secrecy in nomination does not make voters more free; it can limit meaningful choice. C is wrong because nomination transparency does not directly improve the physical arrangement of polling booths. D is wrong because the speed of counting is a separate stage after polling. A fair contest needs clear rules that apply equally to all candidates. Memory cue: hidden entry rules create unequal competition.
16 When can slogans be considered useful in election campaigns?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: A. When they convey policy or message simply to voters
Explanation: Direct answer: A is correct. A slogan is a short and memorable expression used to communicate an idea. In an election campaign, it can help voters quickly understand the main policy direction, public issue, or message of a candidate or party. It is useful only when it informs rather than manipulates. B is wrong because spreading fear pressures voters and damages free choice. C is wrong because hiding bribery is dishonest and illegal, not democratic communication. D is wrong because a slogan cannot and should not remove anyone from a voter list; electoral rolls are handled through official procedures. A slogan is not a substitute for detailed policies, but it can introduce the central message clearly. Memory cue: a good slogan simplifies a message; it does not replace truth or informed judgment.
17 If a candidate promises only free gifts in campaign and gives no policy what should voters consider?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: A. They should examine the policies and feasibility of the promises
Explanation: Direct answer: A is correct. Responsible voters should look beyond an attractive gift promise and ask what the candidate's wider policies are, how the promise could be funded, whether it is practical, and how it would affect the public in the long term. This is informed evaluation rather than automatic acceptance or rejection. B is wrong because choosing only for gifts can distract voters from governance, rights, services, and accountability. C is wrong because avoiding voting removes the citizen's opportunity to make a considered choice. D is wrong because an individual voter cannot personally cancel a candidate's nomination; that belongs to the authorised electoral process. A promise should be judged by feasibility, public interest, and the candidate's overall programme. Memory cue: compare the whole policy plan, not just the attractive offer.
18 What is the importance of voter education during election campaigns?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: A. It helps voters understand rules, candidates and issues
Explanation: Direct answer: A is correct. Voter education gives people clear information about election rules, the voting process, candidates, policies, important issues, and the value of participating freely and responsibly. An educated voter is better able to compare claims, identify misleading information, protect the secrecy of the vote, and make a choice based on public interest rather than pressure or rumours. B is wrong because education does not remove the legal voting age. C is wrong because its purpose is to make candidates and issues clearer, not to hide them. D is wrong because voter education does not stop counting; counting is an official post-poll stage. Voter education supports informed participation, although it does not tell a person whom to vote for. Memory cue: education informs the choice; it does not make the choice for the voter.
19 When is telling a candidate's achievements in campaign considered proper?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: A. When information is factual and helps voters evaluate
Explanation: Direct answer: A is correct. Campaigning may include a candidate's genuine achievements when the information is accurate, relevant, and presented so that voters can compare candidates and judge their record. Factual information supports informed choice, while voters should still consider the full context and not accept every claim without checking it. B is wrong because false achievements mislead voters. C is wrong because using claims or benefits to buy votes undermines free choice and is improper. D is wrong because frightening voters is intimidation, not legitimate persuasion. A proper campaign appeals through information, policies, and public performance rather than lies, money, or threats. Memory cue: achievements are acceptable when they are true and help evaluation; praise alone is not proof.
20 When can criticism of opposition party in campaign be considered democratic?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: A. When criticism is based on policies and work
Explanation: Democratic election campaigning allows parties to discuss public issues and compare their records. Criticism is acceptable when it is based on a party’s policies, decisions, promises, and actual work. Such criticism helps voters understand differences and make an informed choice. It should remain respectful and should not attack people personally or spread unverified claims.
Therefore, option A is correct because policy- and work-based criticism contributes to healthy democratic debate. False rumours cannot guide voters reliably, fear suppresses free choice, and offering money for votes is an unfair electoral practice. The key idea is that criticism should be factual, issue-based, and connected with public performance.
21 What benefit does the process from nomination to campaign give voters?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: A. They know who the candidate is and what the candidate promises
Explanation: Direct answer: A is correct. Nomination formally brings eligible candidates into the contest, while the campaign gives them an opportunity to present their ideas, policies, record, and promises to the public. Together, these stages provide voters with basic information about who is contesting and what each candidate or party claims it will do. Voters can then compare alternatives and make a more informed choice. B is wrong because the process is meant to support participation, not prevent voting. C is wrong because nomination and campaigning do not remove voters from the electoral roll. D is wrong because the number of ballot papers is determined by the election system and is not a benefit created by nomination and campaign. Memory cue: nomination identifies the choices; campaigning explains the choices.
22 If all candidates do not get equal opportunity in campaign what will be the effect on election?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: A. Fair competition will weaken
Explanation: Direct answer: A is correct. Equal opportunity in campaigning allows candidates to communicate their ideas and allows voters to hear more than one side before making a decision. If one candidate receives much greater access to publicity, venues, money, or public attention while others are unfairly restricted, voters may not receive balanced information and the contest becomes unequal. B is wrong because campaign equality does not automatically revise the voter list. C is wrong because it cannot change the legal voting age. D is wrong because unequal campaign opportunities do not remove the need for formal nomination. Democratic competition requires both a genuine choice of candidates and a reasonably fair chance to present their messages. Memory cue: unequal opportunity means unequal voice, and unequal voice weakens fair competition.
23 What is the most correct conclusion about the combined role of nomination and election campaign?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: A. Nomination defines electoral choices and campaign informs about those choices
Explanation: Direct answer: A is correct. Nomination is the formal stage in which eligible people enter the contest, so it helps establish which candidates are available as electoral choices. The campaign follows by communicating their policies, priorities, record, promises, and arguments to voters. When these processes are conducted according to rules, voters can identify the alternatives and compare them before voting. B is wrong because nomination does not buy votes and campaigning does not count votes; vote counting is a separate official stage. C is wrong because both stages are meant to organise and inform an election, not stop it. D is wrong because neither stage erases the voter list. Memory cue: nomination creates the list of choices; campaign explains the choices; voting selects among them.
24 What is the most balanced feature of a good campaign in democratic elections?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: A. A factual, issue-based and peaceful campaign within the rules
Explanation: Answer: A. A good election campaign helps citizens make a free and informed choice. Candidates should discuss public issues, explain their policies, provide truthful information and follow election rules. Peaceful discussion allows voters to compare alternatives without fear or pressure. Option A is correct because it combines facts, issues, peaceful behaviour and respect for rules. Option B is wrong because money, fear and rumours can manipulate voters and damage free choice. Option C is wrong because public resources should not be used unfairly for a candidate or party. Option D is wrong because appeals based on caste or religion can divide citizens and may violate election rules. Memory cue: a clean campaign is factual, peaceful, issue-based and lawful.
25 If nomination is proper but misinformation is spread during the campaign, what effect will it have on voters?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: A. Voters’ informed decision may be weakened
Explanation: Answer: A. Proper nomination only shows that the candidate has completed the required formal process; it does not make every campaign statement true. Voters need reliable information about candidates, policies and issues to compare choices sensibly. Misinformation can confuse them, create false beliefs and weaken the quality of their decision. Option A is correct. Option B is wrong because misinformation cannot give anyone an extra vote. Option C is wrong because a nomination does not automatically become cancelled merely because the question says misinformation was spread; the legal response depends on the facts and applicable rules. Option D is wrong because a polling booth is part of the election arrangement and is not ended by campaign misinformation. Memory cue: valid nomination and truthful campaigning are separate requirements.
Google Analytics helps us understand site usage. Google may send limited cookie-free signals before your choice. The Live Visitors widget operates independently of this analytics choice; see the privacy policy for its provider and fallback details. Essential site features work without analytics cookies. You can change your choice later in Privacy choices. Privacy policy