Muft Shiksha™ एक 100% Free Education Portal है 🇮🇳, जिसका उद्देश्य Class 9–12 के हर विद्यार्थी तक High-Quality Education को पूरी तरह मुफ्त पहुँचाना है। 🇮🇳 हम मानते हैं कि अच्छी शिक्षा किसी student की आर्थिक स्थिति पर निर्भर नहीं होनी चाहिए। 🇮🇳 हर विद्यार्थी को वही Quality Study Material, MCQs, Quizzes, Exam Preparation, Concept-Based Learning और Bilingual Support मिलना चाहिए, जो आमतौर पर महंगी Coaching या Premium Platforms में मिलता है। Muft Shiksha™ 🇮🇳 इसी सोच के साथ बनाया गया है
In this Class 9 Civics topic from Electoral Politics, students learn how candidates enter an election through nomination, including submitting nomination papers, meeting eligibility requirements, and facing scrutiny. They examine how election campaigns allow parties and candidates to present policies, promises, and manifestos, contact voters, and debate public issues. The topic also explains why campaign rules and the Model Code of Conduct are needed to limit unfair influence, misuse of government resources, hate speech, and excessive spending, helping voters make informed choices.
TOPIC PRACTICE
Quiz this set
Up to 25 questions from this page. Select your focus, then start.
25 questions
Choose questions
Medium · Level 3View options
Fair competition
End of the voter list
Cancellation of delimitation
Lowering the voting age
Medium · Level 3View options
They will not get alternative views and a chance to compare
They will become more free
Nomination will become more transparent
Counting will become fairer
Medium · Level 3View options
Informing voters about the candidate
Stopping voting
Hiding results
Changing delimitation
Medium · Level 3View options
Because voters understand the future plan
Because counting is hidden
Because nomination ends
Because the voter list is cancelled
Medium · Level 3View options
It stops voting
It helps voters evaluate performance
It does delimitation
It hides counting
Medium · Level 3View options
So the voter list is removed
So the voting age changes
So the campaign remains orderly and the public is not unnecessarily disturbed
So the candidate does not file nomination
Medium · Level 3View options
To change counting
To erase the voter list
To hide nomination
For law and order and compliance with rules
Medium · Level 3View options
Free voting and fair campaigning
Distance of the polling station
Candidate’s age
Colour of the voter ID card
Medium · Level 3View options
The voter list will increase
The candidate’s credibility and nomination may be affected
The polling station will change
Delimitation will be cancelled
Medium · Level 3View options
To stop voting
To hide nomination
To help voters examine the candidate’s views
To stop counting
Medium · Level 3View options
Always removing the voter list
Preventing candidates from receiving votes
Hiding the counting of votes
Keeping the campaign organised and regulated
Medium · Level 3View options
Nomination identifies the candidates and campaigning helps them reach voters
Campaigning gives the result first and nomination happens later
Both happen only after counting
Neither has any relation to candidates
Medium · Level 3View options
They will receive less useful information about policies and programmes
The voter list will automatically improve
The counting will become more accurate
Nomination will become easier
Medium · Level 3View options
Manifesto is a detailed policy document and slogan is a short message
Both are voter lists
Slogan is nomination paper and manifesto is counting
Both are unrelated to election
Medium · Level 3View options
They are used with rules and correct information
They always spread rumours
They frighten voters
They stop voting
Medium · Level 3View options
They will find it difficult to compare candidates’ policies and make an informed decision
They will lose the right to obtain a voter identity card
Votes cannot be counted after polling
Constituency boundaries will change automatically
Medium · Level 3View options
So voters can understand the realism of promises
So voting is stopped
So nomination is hidden
So voter list is removed
Medium · Level 3View options
It makes all candidates exactly equal
It can put candidates with fewer resources behind
It improves voter list
It removes need for nomination
Medium · Level 3View options
Voter list will improve
Counting will be fast
Voters will get less information about all choices
Delimitation will be correct
Medium · Level 3View options
To stop voters from voting
To stop campaign
To hide counting
To make candidacy process rule based
Medium · Level 3View options
So they can compare policies and promises
So they can approve candidates’ nomination papers
So they can count votes after polling
So they can declare election results
Medium · Level 3View options
Candidates toward voters
Polling station wall
Weather department
Sports committee
Medium · Level 3View options
Ability to choose with information
Distance of polling station
Voter age
Size of ballot paper
Medium · Level 3View options
They promote healthy and democratic debate
They prevent voters from voting
They end the nomination process of candidates
They remove names from the electoral roll
Medium · Level 3View options
Nomination gives official entry to a candidate and campaigning takes the message to voters
Nomination is counting and campaigning is delimitation
Nomination stops voting and campaigning removes the electoral roll
Nomination is only the result and campaigning has no role
Question 1MediumLevel 3
Giving all parties an opportunity to campaign is linked with which democratic condition?
Correct answer: A
Direct answer: A is correct. Elections are meaningful when parties and candidates can present different ideas and voters can hear competing alternatives under common rules. Giving all parties a fair opportunity to campaign supports equal political competition and helps prevent one side from using power to silence others. B is wrong because voter lists identify eligible voters and are not ended by campaign opportunities. C is wrong because delimitation concerns constituency boundaries. D is wrong because campaign access does not change the legal voting age. Memory cue: equal chance to speak supports fair competition and informed choice.
If only one party is allowed to campaign, what weakness will voters face?
Correct answer: A
Direct answer: A is correct. Voters need access to different parties, ideas, policies, and criticisms to make a meaningful choice. If only one party can campaign, the public receives a one-sided message and cannot properly compare alternatives or question the ruling or competing claims. This weakens political competition and informed consent. B is wrong because removing alternatives reduces, rather than increases, political freedom. C is wrong because one-party campaigning does not automatically make nomination transparent. D is wrong because counting fairness depends on counting procedures, not on silencing campaign opponents. Memory cue: no alternative message means no real comparison.
Asking information from a candidate during nomination fulfils which democratic purpose?
Correct answer: A
Correct answer: A, informing voters about the candidate. During nomination, a candidate submits required details so that voters can know important facts before choosing. In a democracy, voting should be based on awareness rather than guesswork, pressure, or rumours. Such information supports comparison between candidates and helps citizens make a responsible choice. A is correct because disclosure improves voter knowledge. B is wrong because asking for information does not stop polling; it supports meaningful polling. C is wrong because the purpose is transparency, not hiding results. D is wrong because delimitation means fixing constituency boundaries and is unrelated to candidate disclosure. Memory cue: nomination gives information; voting uses that information to choose.
Why is telling policies and programmes important in an election campaign?
Correct answer: A
Correct answer: A, because voters understand the proposed future plan. An election campaign is not only a request for votes; it is also a chance for candidates and parties to explain what they want to do if elected. Policies describe the broad approach, while programmes describe proposed actions. Voters can compare these ideas with their needs and judge which plan they prefer. A is correct because it supports issue-based and informed choice. B is wrong because explaining policies has nothing to do with hiding vote counting. C is wrong because campaign discussion does not end nomination; nomination is an earlier formal step. D is wrong because voter-list preparation is a separate electoral activity. Memory cue: policies explain direction, programmes explain action, and campaigns explain both to voters.
How is telling a candidate's past work useful for voters in elections?
Correct answer: B
Information about a candidate’s past work helps voters judge whether the candidate has fulfilled earlier responsibilities. It provides evidence for comparing promises with actual performance. Voters can ask whether the person completed projects, responded to public needs, acted responsibly, and worked in the interest of the community. This makes voting more informed and accountable, although past work is only one source of information and should be considered along with policies and conduct.
Option B is correct because it directly describes evaluating performance. Option A is the opposite of the democratic purpose of campaign information: useful information supports, rather than stops, voting. Option C refers to changing electoral boundaries, which is delimitation, and option D refers to hiding vote counting. Neither has a connection with assessing a candidate’s record. The past record helps citizens make a reasoned choice.
Why are rules placed on the use of loudspeakers in election campaigns?
Correct answer: C
Correct answer: C. Loudspeakers can help a campaign reach people, but excessive volume or unsuitable timing can disturb residents, students, patients, workers, and other members of the public. Rules try to balance the candidate’s opportunity to communicate with everyone’s need for peace, safety, and orderly public life. C is correct because campaign regulation prevents unnecessary disturbance while allowing lawful campaigning. A is wrong because loudspeaker rules do not remove voter lists. B is wrong because they do not change the legal voting age. D is wrong because they do not prevent a person from filing nomination. The rule regulates the method and timing of campaigning, not the existence of elections. Memory cue: campaign freedom operates within public-order rules.
Why may permission be necessary for a procession during an election campaign?
Correct answer: D
Correct answer: D, for law and order and compliance with rules. A procession uses public roads and may affect traffic, nearby residents, other campaign groups, and emergency movement. Permission allows the authorities to know the route, time, and arrangements and to coordinate safety fairly. D is correct because the purpose is orderly public activity and observance of election rules, not suppression of legitimate campaigning. A is wrong because permission cannot change vote counting. B is wrong because it has no connection with deleting voter lists. C is wrong because a procession does not hide the nomination process. Permission is a regulatory safeguard; it does not automatically mean that a candidate is forbidden to campaign. Memory cue: public route plus public crowd means planning, permission, and order.
If a candidate asks for support by threatening voters, which condition of election is affected?
Correct answer: A
Correct answer: A, free voting and fair campaigning. A democratic election requires voters to make a choice without fear, force, or intimidation. A threat can make a voter support a candidate unwillingly, so the vote is no longer a genuinely free expression of preference. It also makes the campaign unfair because one candidate is using pressure instead of persuasion and public discussion. A is correct for both reasons. B is wrong because intimidation does not determine how far a polling station is. C is wrong because the candidate’s age is a separate eligibility matter. D is wrong because the colour of an identity card has no bearing on freedom of choice. Memory cue: fear changes choice; therefore intimidation attacks free and fair elections.
What problem may arise from giving wrong information in a nomination paper?
Correct answer: B
Correct answer: B. A nomination paper is an official election document, so the information provided should be truthful and complete. Wrong information can mislead voters, reduce confidence in the candidate, and create a problem under the rules governing nomination. Depending on the nature and legal treatment of the false information, the candidate’s nomination or later eligibility may be questioned. B is correct because it captures both loss of credibility and possible procedural consequences. A is wrong because a candidate’s false statement does not increase the voter list. C is wrong because polling-station arrangements are separate. D is wrong because delimitation concerns constituency boundaries, not the truthfulness of a nomination paper. Memory cue: official form means truthful disclosure.
For what purpose is question-and-answer interaction with voters useful during a campaign?
Correct answer: C
Correct answer: C. Question-and-answer interaction gives voters an opportunity to ask about issues, plans, priorities, and the reasons behind a candidate’s proposals. The candidate’s responses help citizens understand the person’s thinking and compare it with other choices. This makes the campaign more participatory and supports informed voting. C is correct because public questioning helps voters examine views rather than simply hear one-way slogans. A is wrong because interaction encourages participation and does not stop voting. B is wrong because it does not conceal nomination. D is wrong because it occurs before counting and cannot stop it. Memory cue: questions test ideas; answers help voters judge them.
What can be the purpose of placing a time limit on the campaign period?
Correct answer: D
Correct answer: D. A fixed campaign period gives candidates a defined opportunity to present their views and gives voters time to listen, compare, and decide. It also prevents campaigning from continuing without limit, which could create disorder, constant pressure, unfair advantage, or disturbance close to polling. D is correct because time regulation helps maintain an organised and balanced election process. A is wrong because a campaign deadline does not remove the voter list. B is wrong because it does not stop candidates from receiving votes; it sets a common campaign framework. C is wrong because counting is a later stage and is not hidden by a campaign timetable. Memory cue: a clear campaign schedule supports equal opportunity and orderly voting.
What is the correct relation between nomination and campaign in elections?
Correct answer: A
Correct answer: A. Nomination is the formal stage in which eligible persons submit their names and documents to contest an election; after the relevant process, the contesting candidates are known. Campaigning is the later stage in which those candidates communicate their policies, programmes, qualifications, and views to voters. A is correct because it states both the sequence and the function of the two stages. B is wrong because the campaign does not produce results before nomination, and nomination is not later. C is wrong because both stages occur before polling and counting. D is wrong because both activities are directly connected with candidates. Memory cue: nomination enters the contest; campaign explains the contestant.
If a candidate makes the campaign only a personal attack, what loss can voters face?
Correct answer: A
Correct answer: A. Voters need information about policies, programmes, priorities, and proposed solutions so that they can compare candidates on public issues. A campaign based only on personal attacks shifts attention away from these matters and may leave voters with less useful knowledge for making a choice. A is correct because the main loss is reduced issue-based information and weaker public discussion. B is wrong because personal attacks do not improve the voter list. C is wrong because campaign language does not make vote counting more accurate. D is wrong because nomination is a separate formal process and is not made easier by attacks. Personal criticism may also increase hostility without explaining what the candidate will do. Memory cue: judge public plans, not merely personal insults.
What is the main difference between manifesto and election slogan?
Correct answer: A
Correct answer: A. A manifesto is a written statement in which a political party explains its main policies, priorities and promises. It may discuss several subjects and give voters material for comparison. An election slogan is much shorter: it is a memorable phrase used to express one central idea or attract attention during a campaign. Thus, both may be used in campaigning, but they do not have the same form or amount of detail. Option A is correct because it identifies the manifesto as detailed and the slogan as brief. Option B is wrong because a voter list contains the names of eligible voters, not campaign ideas. Option C is wrong because nomination papers and vote counting are separate election procedures. Option D is wrong because both are connected with election campaigns. Memory cue: manifesto means “many policies”; slogan means “short line”.
Use of social media or posters in campaign is proper with which condition?
Correct answer: A
Correct answer: A. Social media and posters can help candidates communicate policies and reach voters, but campaign communication must remain lawful, truthful and respectful. Electoral rules exist to prevent intimidation, false claims, hate messages, misuse of public property and other unfair practices. Option A is correct because it combines compliance with rules and the sharing of correct information. Option B is wrong because spreading rumours misleads voters and damages informed choice. Option C is wrong because threatening voters removes their freedom to decide. Option D is wrong because stopping people from voting attacks the basic democratic process. A useful check is to ask: Is the message true, lawful and non-threatening? If not, it is not responsible campaigning.
If a candidate does not clearly explain plans in campaign what difficulty will voters face?
Correct answer: A
Correct answer: A. Campaigns are not only occasions for publicity; they also help voters learn what candidates intend to do. A voter can make a reasoned choice only after understanding the different policies, priorities and plans. If one candidate gives vague or unclear information, voters cannot compare promises properly and may have to decide without sufficient knowledge. Option A states this direct difficulty. Option B is wrong because voter identity documents are governed by voter-registration procedures, not by the clarity of a campaign speech. Option C is wrong because counting follows polling arrangements and election rules. Option D is wrong because constituency boundaries are determined through a separate legal and administrative process. Memory cue: clear campaign information supports informed choice.
Why is checking promises in an election campaign necessary?
Correct answer: A
Correct answer: A. Election promises should not be accepted only because they sound attractive. Voters can examine whether a promise is realistic, useful and consistent with the party’s policies, resources and earlier record. They may compare present promises with past performance and ask how the proposed work would be carried out. This helps them make a more informed choice. Option A is correct because checking promises helps voters judge their realism. Option B is wrong because examining promises is meant to improve voting, not stop it. Option C is wrong because nomination is a formal candidacy process and should not be hidden. Option D is wrong because voter lists identify eligible voters and are unrelated to testing promises. Memory cue: compare promises with plans and performance, not just attractive words.
How does excessive use of money power weaken fairness in campaign?
Correct answer: B
Correct answer: B. A fair election should give candidates a meaningful opportunity to present their ideas and compete under common rules. When money is used excessively, a wealthy candidate or party may buy much more advertising, transport, publicity and campaign material. Candidates with fewer resources may struggle to reach voters even when they have useful policies. This creates an unequal advantage and can make public discussion depend too much on spending. Option B is correct. Option A is the opposite of the likely effect. Option C is wrong because money spent in campaigning does not improve the official voter list. Option D is wrong because every candidate must still follow nomination requirements. Memory cue: excessive money power can create unequal voice, not equal opportunity.
If a candidate is stopped from campaigning according to rules what democratic weakness arises?
Correct answer: C
Correct answer: C. Lawful campaigning gives voters information about the candidates, their policies and their differences. If one candidate is unfairly prevented from communicating, voters may hear fewer viewpoints and may not understand the full range of choices before voting. This weakens informed electoral competition. Option C is correct because it describes the loss of information available to voters. Option A is wrong because blocking a campaign does not repair or update a voter list. Option B is wrong because the speed of counting depends on counting arrangements, not on the amount of campaign information. Option D is wrong because delimitation means deciding constituency boundaries and is a separate process. Important warning: reasonable election rules may regulate campaigning, but arbitrary suppression of a valid campaign reduces democratic choice.
Why do formalities like security deposit exist during nomination?
Correct answer: D
Correct answer: D. Nomination is the formal stage at which a person seeks to become a candidate. Requirements such as prescribed forms, deadlines, proposer details and, where applicable, a security deposit help election authorities handle candidacies through a common procedure. They organise the contest and discourage wholly unserious participation, while the rules must be applied equally. Option D is correct because it refers to a rule-based candidacy process. Option A is wrong because nomination formalities do not remove eligible citizens’ right to vote. Option B is wrong because nomination and campaigning are different stages. Option C is wrong because counting is a later process and nomination formalities do not hide it. Memory cue: nomination formalities organise candidates; polling and counting serve later stages.
Why should voters read different manifestos during election campaigns?
Correct answer: A
Correct answer: A. A manifesto presents a party’s important issues, proposed policies and election promises. Reading more than one manifesto allows voters to compare what different parties want to do, whose priorities match their concerns and which proposals appear realistic. This supports an informed and reasoned vote rather than a decision based only on a slogan or personal impression. Option A is correct. Option B is wrong because election officials examine and process nomination papers, not ordinary voters. Option C is wrong because vote counting is carried out through the authorised electoral process after polling. Option D is wrong because official election authorities declare results. Memory cue: manifestos help voters compare; authorities handle nomination, counting and results.
Making candidates' information public in elections makes whom more accountable?
Correct answer: A
Correct answer: A. Public disclosure of relevant candidate information gives voters a basis for judging the people who seek their support. Voters can ask questions about a candidate’s background, declared details, experience and suitability, and can use lawful public information when comparing choices. This encourages candidates to be more open and answerable to the electorate. Option A is correct because accountability is directed toward voters, who may reward or reject candidates through elections. Options B, C and D are wrong because a polling-station wall, the weather department and a sports committee are not the political actors seeking votes or responsible for answering voters about candidacy. Memory cue: transparency lets voters examine candidates; examination creates accountability.
If a candidate hides required information in nomination which right of voters is affected?
Correct answer: A
Correct answer: A. Voters need relevant and truthful information to compare candidates and make a meaningful electoral choice. If a candidate hides information that must be disclosed during nomination, voters may be unable to assess the candidate properly. This creates a transparency problem and weakens informed decision-making. Option A is correct because it directly describes the voter’s ability to choose on the basis of information. Option B is wrong because polling-station distance is an administrative arrangement and is not changed by hidden nomination information. Option C is wrong because a voter’s age is determined by legal eligibility rules, not by a candidate’s disclosure. Option D is wrong because ballot-paper size is an election-management matter. Memory cue: hidden facts reduce informed choice, not the physical arrangements of voting.
What is the importance of correct facts and decent language in election campaign?
Correct answer: A
Direct answer: Correct facts and decent language promote healthy and democratic debate. During an election, voters need reliable information about candidates, policies, promises, and public issues so that they can compare choices and decide freely. Correct facts reduce confusion and help people judge claims carefully. Decent language means discussing differences without insults, threats, hatred, or personal abuse. Such communication respects opponents and voters and keeps competition peaceful. Option A is correct because informed and respectful discussion strengthens democracy. Option B is wrong because responsible campaigning should encourage eligible citizens to vote, not stop them. Option C is wrong because nomination is a separate official process through which candidates enter the contest. Option D is wrong because campaign language does not remove names from voter lists. Memory cue: facts inform, decent words respect, and both support free choice.
Which option correctly shows the roles of nomination and campaign?
Correct answer: A
Direct answer: Option A correctly describes both roles. Nomination is the formal stage in which a person submits the required papers and enters the list of candidates after the prescribed process. Campaigning comes later as candidates and parties present their policies, programmes, promises, and views to voters. It helps citizens learn about the available choices before voting. Option A is correct because it connects nomination with official entry and campaign with communication. Option B is wrong: counting happens after polling, while delimitation means arranging constituency boundaries. Option C is wrong because neither nomination nor campaigning stops voting or deletes the electoral roll. Option D is wrong because nomination is not the election result, and campaigning has an important informational role. Memory cue: nomination means entry; campaign means explanation and appeal.
Google Analytics helps us understand site usage. Google may send limited cookie-free signals before your choice. The Live Visitors widget operates independently of this analytics choice; see the privacy policy for its provider and fallback details. Essential site features work without analytics cookies. You can change your choice later in Privacy choices. Privacy policy