01 What is the main difference between valid criticism and false rumour?
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: A. Valid criticism is based on facts and reasoning while a rumour can spread misinformation
Explanation: Answer: A. Valid criticism examines a policy, decision or promise using facts, evidence and reasoning. It may point out mistakes, costs or possible harmful effects, but it does not need to attack a person falsely. A rumour is unverified information passed from one person to another; it may be incomplete, exaggerated or completely false. In an election, criticism helps voters compare candidates and make an informed choice, whereas a false rumour can confuse voters and damage a person’s reputation without proof. A is correct because it clearly separates evidence-based discussion from misinformation. B is wrong because criticism and rumour have different standards of truth. C is wrong because a rumour is not guaranteed to be correct. D is wrong because respectful, lawful criticism is an important part of democratic debate. Memory cue: criticism asks, “What is the evidence?”; a rumour often asks only, “Have you heard this?”