Right to Constitutional RemediesExpanding scope of rights

Correct answer: A. An organization approaches court for rights of children affected by child labour

Explanation: PIL is most appropriate when a genuine legal or constitutional problem affects the public, a group, or vulnerable people who may be unable to approach the court themselves. Child labour concerns exploitation, dignity, education, and the protection of children as a disadvantaged group. An organisation seeking judicial attention for those children therefore presents a public cause rather than a private commercial dispute, making option A correct. Buying a mobile is an individual consumer choice, selecting a jersey colour is a personal or sporting matter, and changing a shop sign is an ordinary business decision. These alternatives do not show the broad rights-based concern required for PIL.

Correct answer: A. In Human Rights Commission or court

Explanation: The governing concept is the availability of remedies when rights are violated. A person may approach an appropriate Human Rights Commission, a court, or another legally empowered authority, depending on the facts and the remedy required. These institutions can receive complaints, examine alleged violations, direct inquiry or action within their powers, and provide or order suitable relief under law. Therefore option A is correct. A sports club, weather department, or market committee may serve specialised administrative purposes, but they are not the ordinary institutions for deciding a human-rights violation. The important reasoning is to connect a rights complaint with an institution that has legal authority, investigative capacity, or judicial power to protect the affected person.