If a labourer lacks even minimum freedom to leave work, which right concern arises?

Correct answer: Right against Exploitation

The direct answer is A: the Right against Exploitation is concerned. A worker normally needs genuine freedom to accept, continue, or leave employment, subject to lawful notice and contract rules. If a person has no minimum freedom to leave because of threats, debt, confinement, or force, the work may be forced or bonded labour. The reasoning is simple: no freedom to exit means no fully voluntary labour; compelled labour is exploitation; therefore the constitutional concern is the Right against Exploitation. Option A is correct. Option B, religious propagation, means peacefully sharing religious ideas and has no connection with forced work. Option C, abolition of titles, concerns official or social titles, not labour coercion. Option D, language protection, is unrelated to being trapped at work. This question tests recognition of the phrase “no exit.” It does not mean every job with a notice period is forced labour; the concern arises when coercion removes real choice. Memory cue: free work requires a real choice to leave.