Fundamental Rights in the Indian Constitution

Correct answer: A. The state is a source of rights and is also limited by them

Explanation: Direct answer: A. The Constitution creates and protects a framework of rights, while those same rights place limits on state power. The state has authority to make laws and govern, but it cannot use that authority arbitrarily or violate constitutional guarantees. Rights therefore have a double importance: they empower public institutions to organise democratic life and restrain those institutions from abusing power. B is wrong because the state is bound by the Constitution and rights. C is wrong because Fundamental Rights are legal and constitutional guarantees, not gifts that the government may withdraw whenever it wishes. D is wrong because rights limit state power rather than giving it unlimited authority. A does not mean that the government can freely invent rights; it means that the constitutional state recognises, protects, and is judged by rights. Memory cue: constitutional government is power authorised by law and restrained by rights.

Correct answer: A. Prohibition stops earlier, while certiorari reviews or cancels an order later

Explanation: Correct answer: A. Both writs supervise lower courts or tribunals, but their timing and purpose differ. Prohibition is preventive: while a proceeding is still going on, a higher court orders the lower court or tribunal not to continue beyond its jurisdiction. Certiorari is generally corrective: after an order or decision, a higher court may call for the record and review or quash the decision when legal grounds exist. Option B concerns exploitation and is far too narrow. Option C confuses judicial remedies with religious freedom. Option D is plainly false because both are court-issued writs. Memory cue: prohibition prevents a wrong step; certiorari corrects a completed step.

Correct answer: A. Because the balance between rights and state power is tested during crisis

Explanation: The correct answer is A. An emergency can require the state to respond quickly to a serious crisis, but increased executive power creates a risk that liberty and legal safeguards will be weakened. Studying emergencies therefore helps students ask which rights are affected, what constitutional procedures apply, whether limits are lawful and how accountability is maintained. B is wrong because an emergency does not simply make the Constitution disappear; constitutional rules remain relevant. C gives an unrelated meaning of the word emergency. D is wrong because the state’s crisis powers and Fundamental Rights are closely connected. The precise legal consequences depend on the constitutional provision and situation, so avoid assuming that every right automatically vanishes. Memory cue: crisis may expand state power, but constitutional scrutiny remains essential.

Correct answer: A. Because it can issue writs and orders when rights are violated

Explanation: The judiciary is called a guardian of Fundamental Rights because it provides an independent constitutional remedy when the executive, legislature or another authority violates those rights. Through judicial review, courts can examine unconstitutional action and, where appropriate, issue writs or directions to protect the affected person. Option A is therefore correct: writs and judicial orders turn the promise of rights into enforceable protection. Election campaigns belong to political parties and candidates, tax collection is mainly an executive function, and printing textbooks is an administrative or educational activity. None of those explains the judiciary’s rights-protecting role.