Muft Shiksha™ एक 100% Free Education Portal है 🇮🇳, जिसका उद्देश्य Class 9–12 के हर विद्यार्थी तक High-Quality Education को पूरी तरह मुफ्त पहुँचाना है। 🇮🇳 हम मानते हैं कि अच्छी शिक्षा किसी student की आर्थिक स्थिति पर निर्भर नहीं होनी चाहिए। 🇮🇳 हर विद्यार्थी को वही Quality Study Material, MCQs, Quizzes, Exam Preparation, Concept-Based Learning और Bilingual Support मिलना चाहिए, जो आमतौर पर महंगी Coaching या Premium Platforms में मिलता है। Muft Shiksha™ 🇮🇳 इसी सोच के साथ बनाया गया है
In this Class 9 Artificial Intelligence topic from Communication Skills-I, students explore how perspectives shape the way people send, receive, and interpret messages. They learn to recognise common communication barriers, including unclear language, assumptions, cultural differences, emotions, poor listening, physical distractions, and technology-related problems, and understand how these can lead to misunderstanding. The topic develops empathy, attentive listening, clear expression, and practical ways to improve communication in everyday and collaborative situations.
Practice questions
01 If an employee listens to a customer problem and gives a solution but does not acknowledge the customer's feeling, which aspect remains weak?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: A. Empathy
Explanation: Solving the practical problem is important, but customers also want their frustration, worry, or inconvenience to be recognised. Empathy means noticing and acknowledging another person’s feelings without necessarily agreeing with every claim. A brief statement such as “I understand this has been frustrating” can build trust before the solution is explained. Therefore, empathy is the weak aspect.
02 If a person says, “I will not answer right now because I need to check the facts,” what is this an example of?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: A. Responsible communication
Explanation: Checking facts before answering shows a commitment to accuracy and avoids presenting an uncertain claim as true. The person communicates the reason for delaying the answer and can return with better-supported information. This is not rude silence, because the person has explained the situation; it is not aggression or a privacy breach. Therefore, responsible communication is the correct choice.
03 If a student uses humor on a serious topic and the audience becomes uncomfortable, which skill is weak?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: A. Sensitivity and context understanding
Explanation: Effective communication requires adapting words, examples, and tone to the subject and the audience. Humour that may be harmless in a casual setting can seem disrespectful or insensitive during a serious discussion. The audience’s discomfort signals that the speaker failed to read the context and emotional expectations. Speaking speed, a letter address, or a question number is unrelated, so A is correct.
04 If members of a group understand different meanings of the same word, what is the most effective group measure to remove this confusion?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: A. Establish shared terminology and definitions
Explanation: Different meanings create a semantic barrier because group members interpret the same word differently. Agreeing on shared terminology and recording clear definitions gives everyone a common reference. Silencing people or stopping work avoids discussion, while leaving meanings unclear preserves the barrier. Hence, option A is the practical and lasting solution.
05 If a person sends vague messages to avoid a difficult conversation, what may be a long-term result?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: A. Both trust and clarity may decrease
Explanation: A vague message makes the receiver guess what the sender means. Different guesses can create misunderstanding, delay resolution, and reduce trust. Avoiding a difficult conversation does not remove the underlying issue; it often makes future discussion harder. Therefore, option A correctly describes the likely long-term effect.
06 If a person uses another person's private experience as an example without permission, which two things are affected?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: A. Privacy and sensitivity
Explanation: A private experience belongs to the person's personal life and may contain emotionally sensitive information. Using it publicly without permission can expose private details, cause embarrassment, and damage trust. The issue is therefore both respect for privacy and sensitivity toward the person's feelings. Time, colour, stage, title, and decoration do not address this ethical communication concern.
07 If both facts and emotions are present in a discussion, what should a mature response be like?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: A. Acknowledge emotions while responding on the basis of verified facts
Explanation: Mature communication combines empathy with accuracy. The speaker should acknowledge feelings so the other person feels heard, then use verified facts rather than assumptions or personal opinion to reach a conclusion. Ignoring emotions harms the relationship, while changing facts or reacting without listening is dishonest and ineffective. Hence, option A is the balanced response.
08 If a speaker changes examples according to the audience’s level but keeps the main facts the same, what is the speaker doing?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: B. Adapting the message to the audience
Explanation: Audience adaptation means changing vocabulary, examples, pace, or explanation style to match the listeners' knowledge and needs while preserving the message's factual meaning. Since the speaker keeps the main facts unchanged, the communication is adapted rather than distorted. Hiding evidence or preventing feedback is not implied. Therefore, option B is correct.
09 If a report is submitted on time but citations for half of its sources are missing, which balance has been affected?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: A. Balance between timeliness and credibility
Explanation: Submitting on time shows timeliness, but missing citations make claims difficult to check and weaken academic credibility. A good report must meet its deadline while also documenting sources accurately. The problem is not primarily length, tone, or visual design. Therefore, option A correctly identifies the affected balance between prompt delivery and trustworthy evidence.
10 If a public message contains true information but also includes unnecessary personally identifying details, what is the appropriate edit?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: A. Remove unnecessary personally identifying details while retaining the necessary information
Explanation: Truth alone does not make every detail appropriate for public disclosure. The editor should retain information needed for the public purpose but remove unnecessary names, addresses, contact details, or other identifiers. This follows data minimisation and protects privacy. Adding details or publishing unchanged increases risk, while deleting the entire useful message is unnecessarily extreme. Option A is correct.
11 If a speaker accepts a mistake but does not explain a correction plan, what may remain in the audience's mind?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: A. Concern that the mistake may repeat
Explanation: Admitting an error is an important first step because it shows honesty, but it does not explain how the problem will be fixed or prevented. Without a corrective plan, listeners may reasonably worry that the same mistake will happen again. A clear plan should state the correction, responsibility, and preventive action. Thus, option A is correct.
12 If a student accurately and fairly summarizes the other side’s view before expressing disagreement, which higher communication skill is being demonstrated?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: B. Active listening and respectful disagreement
Explanation: Accurately summarizing another person’s view shows that the student has listened carefully, understood the message, and represented it fairly. Expressing a different opinion only after this step demonstrates respectful disagreement rather than hostility. Aggressive opposition attacks or dismisses the other person, breach of confidentiality concerns sharing private information, and incomplete communication does not show full understanding.
13 If a person says, “Your point is important, but we will hear all sides before making a decision,” which communication skill does this response demonstrate?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: B. Active listening and participative decision-making
Explanation: The response acknowledges one person’s contribution and commits to hearing other perspectives before deciding. That combination shows active listening and participative decision-making. One-way communication would announce a decision without inviting views, while aggression attacks others and topic avoidance refuses to address the decision at all.
14 If a student hears only half of a virtual meeting discussion because of a technical problem and then makes a decision, what is the biggest mistake?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: A. Making a decision on incomplete information
Explanation: Hearing only half the discussion means that important facts, objections, or alternatives may be missing. A responsible participant should ask for the recording, summary, or repetition of key points before deciding. The central error is not the choice of channel or punctuality; it is reaching a conclusion without sufficient information.
15 If a report uses neutral language but does not cite the sources of its data, which quality remains incomplete?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: A. Credibility
Explanation: Neutral wording supports impartiality, but readers also need sources to check where data came from and whether the claims can be trusted. Without citations, the report’s credibility is weaker even if its language is clear. Clarity concerns ease of understanding, conciseness concerns length, and politeness concerns tone.
16 If a person listens only to find weaknesses for winning, what happens to the purpose of dialogue?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: A. It shifts from understanding to competition
Explanation: Constructive dialogue aims to understand meanings, reasons, and concerns so that people can respond thoughtfully. Listening only to find weaknesses changes the interaction into a contest in which winning matters more than mutual understanding. This approach can increase defensiveness and tension; it does not create empathy, writing, or privacy.
17 If there is disagreement about a group decision and the leader says, “First, we will write down the reasons for the disagreement,” what does this demonstrate?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: A. Structured problem analysis
Explanation: Recording the reasons for disagreement separates the issue into identifiable points and helps the group examine causes rather than attack people. It creates a structured basis for discussion and possible solutions. This approach does not suppress feedback or hide information; it makes viewpoints more visible and manageable.
18 If a public notice contains all the necessary information but is written in language that only experts can understand, which two aspects of communication are weak?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: A. Accessibility and comprehensibility
Explanation: A public notice should be accessible to its intended audience and comprehensible to ordinary readers, not merely complete in content. Specialist-only language creates a barrier to both reaching people effectively and being understood by them. The options about source, colour, silence, distance, humour, or decoration do not describe the central language problem.
19 If a person says that your point is wrong but gives no reason, what is the most appropriate response?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: A. Please clarify the reason or evidence for your disagreement.
Explanation: Asking politely for a reason or evidence turns an unsupported claim into a point that can be examined. It keeps the conversation open and encourages constructive disagreement. Option B merely repeats an unsupported rejection, while C and D dismiss the person or close discussion without improving understanding.
20 If a group leader announces a decision immediately while in an emotional state, what is the greatest risk?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: A. The decision may be biased or rushed.
Explanation: Strong emotions can reduce objectivity, careful listening, and the ability to compare alternatives. If a leader announces a decision immediately, important facts or viewpoints may be missed, and personal bias may influence the result. Therefore, the decision may be rushed or unfair. The other options are incorrect because facts do not appear automatically, agreement cannot be assumed, and feedback may still be necessary.
21 If a message is technically correct but a general reader feels intimidated or withdraws, what improvement is needed?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: A. Simple language and supporting example
Explanation: Technical accuracy alone does not guarantee effective communication. A general audience may need familiar words, short explanations, and an example that connects the idea with everyday experience. Simplifying the language while preserving the correct meaning can improve confidence and understanding. More difficult terms would increase the barrier, removing the message would avoid rather than solve the problem, and blaming the reader is not constructive.
22 If a student says, “I am angry right now, so I will talk after I calm down,” which communication skill is the student demonstrating?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: A. Emotional self-regulation
Explanation: The student notices the current emotion and deliberately postpones the conversation until a calmer response is possible. This is emotional self-regulation: managing feelings and behaviour so that communication remains respectful and useful. It is not passive avoidance because the student intends to return to the issue. Privacy and summarising are unrelated to the decision described in the statement.
23 If an instruction says “work carefully” but does not state what care means, what is missing?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: A. Specific precaution details
Explanation: The word “carefully” is too general unless the instruction explains the actual risks and precautions. A useful instruction might state what to check, what equipment to use, what action to avoid, or when to seek help. Specific details reduce different interpretations and make safe action possible. Greetings, smiles, or an unrelated picture do not explain what careful work requires.
24 If accusations begin before discussing the problem in a group, what should the leader do?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: A. Bring the discussion back to problem and facts
Explanation: A leader should redirect the group from personal blame to the specific problem, available facts, and possible actions. This keeps the discussion solution-focused and gives quieter members a fair chance to contribute. Increasing accusations can escalate conflict, ending without any conclusion may leave the issue unresolved, and listening only to the loudest person is neither fair nor evidence-based.
25 If a student wants to use a person's private mistake as an example for learning, what is the most appropriate method?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: A. Use the example generally after obtaining permission and concealing the person's identity.
Explanation: A private mistake is sensitive personal information. Permission should be obtained before using it, and the person’s identity should be hidden so that the lesson focuses on the general learning point rather than on embarrassment. Naming the person, joking about the mistake, or spreading details can harm dignity, trust, and privacy.
Google Analytics helps us understand site usage. Google may send limited cookie-free signals before your choice. The Live Visitors widget operates independently of this analytics choice; see the privacy policy for its provider and fallback details. Essential site features work without analytics cookies. You can change your choice later in Privacy choices. Privacy policy