In which situation can breaking a line be considered an intentional artistic decision?

When the artist wants to suggest lightness, distance, or incompleteness

The governing concept is purposeful omission and variation in line. A broken line is not necessarily an error; an artist may interrupt it to keep an edge light, suggest a distant or partly hidden object, imply movement, or leave the viewer to complete an incomplete form. Option A correctly describes these intentional expressive purposes. Whether the decision succeeds depends on consistency with the subject and composition, not merely on the presence of gaps. Option B treats every break as lack of skill, which ignores deliberate technique. Options C and D provide no artistic purpose or visual intention. The key distinction is between an uncontrolled accidental break and a controlled interruption used to communicate an idea.

This is a Class 9 Art Education question. Chapter: Elements of Art. Topic: Line.