What caution should historians exercise when linking seals with trade?
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: It should be regarded as a possible interpretation, not an established fact
The governing historical principle is to distinguish direct evidence from interpretation. Harappan seals may have helped identify people, goods, ownership, administration, or exchange, and their presence can support a connection with trade. However, the exact function is not always proved by direct written evidence. Therefore, option B is correct: the trade connection remains a plausible interpretation, not an absolute fact. Animal motifs alone cannot settle the issue.
Frequently asked questions
What is the correct answer to this question?
It should be regarded as a possible interpretation, not an established fact
Why is this the correct answer?
The governing historical principle is to distinguish direct evidence from interpretation. Harappan seals may have helped identify people, goods, ownership, administration, or exchange, and their presence can support a connection with trade. However, the exact function is not always proved by direct written evidence. Therefore, option B is correct: the trade connection remains a plausible interpretation, not an absolute fact. Animal motifs alone cannot settle the issue.
Which subject and chapter does this question cover?
This is a Class 12 History question. Chapter: Bricks, Beads and Bones. Topic: how historians use archaeological evidence.
Student feedback
Was this question useful?
👍 0 Helpful 👎 0 Not helpful
Yes 0% No 0%
0 responsesStudent Reviews
No published reviews yet.
