Correct answer: A. Symmetric
Explanation: The direct answer is A: symmetric is the false property. A relation is reflexive when every diagonal pair (a,a) is present. Here (1,1),(2,2),(3,3) are all listed, so it is reflexive. It is antisymmetric because the only non-diagonal pair is (1,2), while (2,1) is absent; there is no distinct pair occurring in both directions. It is transitive: diagonal pairs cause no problem, and the only possible chain involving the extra pair is (1,1),(1,2) or (1,2),(2,2), both leading to (1,2), which is present. However, it is not symmetric because (1,2)\in R but (2,1)\notin R. Therefore A is the false statement. Option B is true due to all diagonal pairs. Option C is true by the definition of antisymmetry. Option D is true after checking the possible chains. A common mistake is to assume that having (1,2) automatically requires (2,1); that requirement belongs to symmetry, not every relation.