महाद्वीपीय तटों के मिलान वाले प्रमाण की तुलना में समुद्र-तल प्रसरण का प्रमाण अधिक निर्णायक क्यों माना गया?
Why was sea-floor spreading evidence considered more decisive than the matching of continental margins?
Explanation opens after your attempt
B. क्योंकि इसमें महासागरीय तल से मापनीय भौतिक प्रमाण मिलेBecause it provided measurable physical evidence from the ocean floor
Concept
Matching margins were clues, but ocean-floor ages and magnetic stripes were direct measurements. In exams, distinguish clues from measurable evidence.
Why this answer is correct
The correct answer is B. क्योंकि इसमें महासागरीय तल से मापनीय भौतिक प्रमाण मिले / Because it provided measurable physical evidence from the ocean floor. Matching margins were clues, but ocean-floor ages and magnetic stripes were direct measurements. In exams, distinguish clues from measurable evidence.
Exam Tip
तटों का मिलान संकेत था, पर समुद्री आयु और चुंबकीय पट्टियाँ प्रत्यक्ष माप थीं। परीक्षा में संकेत और मापनीय प्रमाण में अंतर करें।
Login to save your score, XP, coins and progress.
