Why are both archaeological and literary sources necessary for studying ancient India?
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: Together they give a more balanced understanding of history
Archaeological sources reveal buildings, tools, pottery, bones, coins, and settlement patterns, while literary sources preserve ideas, rules, narratives, descriptions, and social concerns. Each type has strengths and limitations: texts may be selective or idealised, and objects may not explain their own meaning. Using both and comparing them produces a fuller, more balanced interpretation rather than eliminating the need for evidence.
Frequently asked questions
What is the correct answer to this question?
Together they give a more balanced understanding of history
Why is this the correct answer?
Archaeological sources reveal buildings, tools, pottery, bones, coins, and settlement patterns, while literary sources preserve ideas, rules, narratives, descriptions, and social concerns. Each type has strengths and limitations: texts may be selective or idealised, and objects may not explain their own meaning. Using both and comparing them produces a fuller, more balanced interpretation rather than eliminating the need for evidence.
Which subject and chapter does this question cover?
This is a Class 11 History question. Chapter: Writing and City Life. Topic: Development and uses of writing.
Student feedback
Was this question useful?
👍 0 Helpful 👎 0 Not helpful
Yes 0% No 0%
0 responsesStudent Reviews
No published reviews yet.
