0 reads0 ratings0 helpful
Why was sea-floor spreading evidence considered more decisive than the matching of continental margins?महाद्वीपीय तटों के मिलान वाले प्रमाण की तुलना में समुद्र-तल प्रसरण का प्रमाण अधिक निर्णायक क्यों माना गया?
Answer and explanationउत्तर और व्याख्या
Correct answer:सही उत्तर: Because it provided measurable physical evidence from the ocean floorक्योंकि इसमें महासागरीय तल से मापनीय भौतिक प्रमाण मिले
Matching margins were clues, but ocean-floor ages and magnetic stripes were direct measurements. In exams, distinguish clues from measurable evidence.तटों का मिलान संकेत था, पर समुद्री आयु और चुंबकीय पट्टियाँ प्रत्यक्ष माप थीं। परीक्षा में संकेत और मापनीय प्रमाण में अंतर करें।
Student feedback
Was this question useful?
Was this question useful?
👍 0 Helpful 👎 0 Not helpful
Difficulty
Easy0%
Medium0%
Hard0%
Was the explanation clear?
Yes 0% No 0%
0 responsesStudent Reviews
No published reviews yet.
