Why was surrendering titles in the Non-Cooperation Movement not only a personal decision but a political step?
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: Because it rejected colonial honours and the moral legitimacy of power
The governing concept is symbolic political non-cooperation. Colonial titles were honours that connected recipients with the prestige and authority of British rule. Returning them publicly rejected that recognition and signalled that the government no longer deserved moral respect or voluntary support. Thus option A is correct. The act did not provide jobs, reduce cloth prices, or directly raise taxes, so the other options are irrelevant.
Frequently asked questions
What is the correct answer to this question?
Because it rejected colonial honours and the moral legitimacy of power
Why is this the correct answer?
The governing concept is symbolic political non-cooperation. Colonial titles were honours that connected recipients with the prestige and authority of British rule. Returning them publicly rejected that recognition and signalled that the government no longer deserved moral respect or voluntary support. Thus option A is correct. The act did not provide jobs, reduce cloth prices, or directly raise taxes, so the other options are irrelevant.
Which subject and chapter does this question cover?
This is a Class 10 Social Science question. Chapter: Chapter 2: Nationalism in India. Topic: The First World War, Khilafat, and Non-Cooperation.
Student feedback
Was this question useful?
👍 0 Helpful 👎 0 Not helpful
Yes 0% No 0%
0 responsesStudent Reviews
No published reviews yet.
