Why was returning government titles not merely a personal act in the Non-Cooperation Movement?
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: It publicly rejected colonial honour and loyalty
The governing concept is symbolic political protest. Government titles were not simply private honours; they represented recognition and loyalty granted by the colonial state. Returning them publicly rejected that relationship and questioned the moral authority of British rule. It also encouraged others to renounce colonial symbols and express national self-respect. Thus option A is correct. Option B reverses the meaning, while options C and D concern unrelated areas and do not explain the political symbolism of titles.
Frequently asked questions
What is the correct answer to this question?
It publicly rejected colonial honour and loyalty
Why is this the correct answer?
The governing concept is symbolic political protest. Government titles were not simply private honours; they represented recognition and loyalty granted by the colonial state. Returning them publicly rejected that relationship and questioned the moral authority of British rule. It also encouraged others to renounce colonial symbols and express national self-respect. Thus option A is correct. Option B reverses the meaning, while options C and D concern unrelated areas and do not explain the political symbolism of titles.
Which subject and chapter does this question cover?
This is a Class 10 Social Science question. Chapter: Chapter 2: Nationalism in India. Topic: The First World War, Khilafat, and Non-Cooperation.
Student feedback
Was this question useful?
👍 0 Helpful 👎 0 Not helpful
Yes 0% No 0%
0 responsesStudent Reviews
No published reviews yet.
