Why was burning foreign cloth not only an economic step but also a symbolic one?
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: Because it publicly rejected colonial goods
Foreign cloth represented the economic reach of colonial rule and competed with Indian hand-spinning and weaving. Burning it publicly transformed an economic boycott into a visible act of protest. The act expressed rejection of colonial dependence and demonstrated commitment to swadeshi and national self-respect. Option A is therefore correct. The remaining options are inconsistent: the action did not benefit British mills, popularise foreign cloth, or directly increase taxes.
Frequently asked questions
What is the correct answer to this question?
Because it publicly rejected colonial goods
Why is this the correct answer?
Foreign cloth represented the economic reach of colonial rule and competed with Indian hand-spinning and weaving. Burning it publicly transformed an economic boycott into a visible act of protest. The act expressed rejection of colonial dependence and demonstrated commitment to swadeshi and national self-respect. Option A is therefore correct. The remaining options are inconsistent: the action did not benefit British mills, popularise foreign cloth, or directly increase taxes.
Which subject and chapter does this question cover?
This is a Class 10 Social Science question. Chapter: Chapter 2: Nationalism in India. Topic: The First World War, Khilafat, and Non-Cooperation.
Student feedback
Was this question useful?
👍 0 Helpful 👎 0 Not helpful
Yes 0% No 0%
0 responsesStudent Reviews
No published reviews yet.
